Diffusion‐Weighted MRI of Breast Cancer: Improved Lesion Visibility and Image Quality Using Synthetic b‐Values. Issue 6 (28th May 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bickel, Hubert; Polanec, Stephan H.; Wengert, Georg; Pinker, Katja; Bogner, Wolfgang; Helbich, Thomas H.; Baltzer, Pascal A.
• Is Part Of: Journal of magnetic resonance imaging. Volume 50:Issue 6(2019)
• Page Start: 1754
• Page End: 1761
• Publication Date: 2019-05-28
• Subjects: Breast neoplasms -- magnetic resonance imaging -- diffusion magnetic resonance imaging -- computer‐assisted image processing; Magnetic resonance imaging -- Periodicals; 616
• DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26809
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1053-1807

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) is an MRI technique with the potential to serve as an unenhanced breast cancer detection tool. Synthetic b‐values produce images with high diffusion weighting to suppress residual background signal, while avoiding additional measurement times and reducing artifacts. Purpose: To compare acquired DWI images (at b = 850 s/mm 2 ) and different synthetic b‐values (at b = 1000–2000 s/mm 2 ) in terms of lesion visibility, image quality, and tumor‐to‐tissue contrast in patients with malignant breast tumors. Study Type: Retrospective. Population: Fifty‐three females with malignant breast lesions. Field Strength/Sequence: T2 w, DWI EPI with STIR fat‐suppression, and dynamic contrast‐enhanced T1 w at 3T. Assessment: From acquired images using b‐values of 50 and 850 s/mm 2, synthetic images were calculated at b = 1000, 1200, 1400, 1600, 1800, and 2000 s/mm 2 . Four readers independently rated image quality, lesion visibility, preferred b‐value, as well as the lowest and highest b‐value, over the range of b‐values tested, to provide a diagnostic image. Statistical Tests: Medians and mean ranks were calculated and compared using the Friedman test and Wilcoxon signed‐rank test. Reproducibility was analyzed by intraclass correlation (ICC), Fleiss, and Cohen's κ. Results: Relative signal‐to‐noise and contrast‐to‐noise ratios decreased with increasing b‐values, while the signal‐intensity ratio between tumor and tissue increased significantly ( P < 0.001). Intermediate b‐values (1200–1800 s/mm 2 ) were rated best concerning image quality and lesion visibility; the preferred b‐value mostly lay at 1200–1600 s/mm 2 . Lowest and highest acceptable b‐values were 850 s/mm 2 and 2000 s/mm 2 . Interreader agreement was moderate to high concerning image quality (ICC: 0.50–0.67) and lesion visibility (0.70–0.93), but poor concerning preferred and acceptable b‐values (κ = 0.032–0.446). Data Conclusion: Synthetically increased b‐values may be a way to improve tumor‐to‐tissue contrast, lesion visibility, and image quality of breast DWI, while avoiding the disadvantages of performing DWI at very high b‐values. Level of Evidence: 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:1754–1761.