Maximum likelihood estimation of generalized linear models for adaptive designs: Applications and asymptotics. Issue 3 (10th December 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Selvaratnam, Selvakkadunko; Yi, Yanqing; Oyet, Alwell
• Is Part Of: Biometrical journal. Volume 61:Issue 3(2019:May)
• Page Start: 630
• Page End: 651
• Publication Date: 2018-12-10
• Subjects: adaptive designs -- clinical trials -- consistency -- generalized linear models -- maximum likelihood estimation; Biometry -- Periodicals; Medical statistics -- Periodicals; 570.15195
• DOI: 10.1002/bimj.201800181
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0323-3847

Abstract

Abstract: Due to increasing discoveries of biomarkers and observed diversity among patients, there is growing interest in personalized medicine for the purpose of increasing the well‐being of patients (ethics) and extending human life. In fact, these biomarkers and observed heterogeneity among patients are useful covariates that can be used to achieve the ethical goals of clinical trials and improving the efficiency of statistical inference. Covariate‐adjusted response‐adaptive (CARA) design was developed to use information in such covariates in randomization to maximize the well‐being of participating patients as well as increase the efficiency of statistical inference at the end of a clinical trial. In this paper, we establish conditions for consistency and asymptotic normality of maximum likelihood (ML) estimators of generalized linear models (GLM) for a general class of adaptive designs. We prove that the ML estimators are consistent and asymptotically follow a multivariate Gaussian distribution. The efficiency of the estimators and the performance of response‐adaptive (RA), CARA, and completely randomized (CR) designs are examined based on the well‐being of patients under a logit model with categorical covariates. Results from our simulation studies and application to data from a clinical trial on stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (SPAF) show that RA designs lead to ethically desirable outcomes as well as higher statistical efficiency compared to CARA designs if there is no treatment by covariate interaction in an ideal model. CARA designs were however more ethical than RA designs when there was significant interaction.