A participatory decision making framework for artisanal fisheries collaborative governance: Insights from management committees in Chile. (20th July 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Estévez, Rodrigo A.; Veloso, Carlos; Jerez, Gabriel; Gelcich, Stefan
• Is Part Of: Natural resources forum. Volume 44:Number 2(2020:May)
• Page Start: 144
• Page End: 160
• Publication Date: 2020-07-20
• Subjects: benthic fisheries -- Chile fishing -- collaborative governance -- deliberation -- Ensis macha -- polycentrism -- scenario analysis -- self‐regulation -- structured decision making -- Tagelus dombeii; Power resources -- Periodicals; 333.7
• DOI: 10.1111/1477-8947.12200
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0165-0203

Abstract

Abstract: Fisheries management is increasingly transitioning towards collaborative governance. Collaborative systems depend on stakeholders' capacity to design and implement legitimate and scientifically robust management plans within collective action arenas. Here we propose that collaborative governance outcomes, in fisheries management, will benefit from using structured participatory decision making frameworks that enhance deliberative thinking among stakeholders. We tested our approach in the artisanal fishery of Chile, an important producer of marine resources. Recently in 2013, Chile made important changes to fisheries policies by creating multi‐sectorial management committees to manage de facto open access fishing areas. We applied a structured decision making framework to inform the restructuring of a management plan within a committee. As a result, we identified goals, objectives and indicators, including social, economic, biological and ecological dimensions; we explored tradeoffs, assessing the relative importance of the objectives; finally, we created scenarios and prioritized alternatives, reflecting on the interplay between self‐regulation and government control. Members of the management committee were able to rationalize the different steps of the framework and identify ways forward which highlighted the importance of self‐regulation in comparison to central authorities' control. We concluded that structured decision making promotes spaces for rational analysis of alternatives costs and benefits. Promoting deliberative thinking in fisheries management can improve equity, legitimacy and sustainability of collaborative governance.