Defining Robustness, Vulnerabilities, and Consequential Scenarios for Diverse Stakeholder Interests in Institutionally Complex River Basins. Issue 7 (13th July 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hadjimichael, Antonia; Quinn, Julianne; Wilson, Erin; Reed, Patrick; Basdekas, Leon; Yates, David; Garrison, Michelle
• Is Part Of: Earth's future. Volume 8:Issue 7(2020)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2020-07-13
• Subjects: water shortage -- multiactor basins -- exploratory modeling -- complex systems -- deep uncertainty -- scenario discovery; Environmental sciences -- Periodicals; Environmental sciences; Periodicals; 550
• DOI: 10.1029/2020EF001503
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2328-4277

Abstract

Abstract: The Upper Basin of the Colorado River in the southwestern United States supports municipal, industrial, agricultural, and recreational activities worth an estimated $300 billion/year within the state of Colorado alone. The allocation of water to these activities is fundamentally shaped by water rights that in turn distribute risks among a diverse suite of sectors and stakeholders. In this study, we assess the vulnerabilities faced by the hierarchy of hundreds of water users in the portion of the Upper Basin within the state of Colorado, as a result of changes in hydrologic extremes, demand growth, and institutional and physical infrastructure in the basin. We also determine how robust the different users are to these potential changes, examining how their sensitivity to these factors depends on the magnitude and frequency of shortage they are unwilling to exceed. This advances previous robustness evaluation methods by formalizing an a posteriori exploration of alternative definitions of robustness tailored to each user's unique context. Our analysis reveals that robustness varies significantly not only across users but also across different definitions of acceptable performance for each user. We further show the importance of using scenario discovery to evaluate how the factors that drive consequential scenarios differ depending on the definition of robustness. Our results highlight the need for robustness and vulnerability frameworks to avoid broad categorical aggregations of stakeholder groups, to carefully capture complex institutional dependencies (e.g., water rights), and to facilitate a more transparent illustration of the implications of alternative definitions of robustness for specific stakeholders. Key Points: Expand bottom‐up vulnerability assessments to highly resolved multi‐user systems governed by prior appropriation Advance robustness analysis methods to account for both multiple stakeholders, and multiple definitions of vulnerability for each Illustrate how user‐specific scenario discovery reveals the diversity of stakeholder vulnerabilities in institutionally complex river basins