Five-Year Follow-up of Minimally Invasive Distal Metatarsal Chevron Osteotomy in Comparison with the Open Technique: A Randomized Controlled Trial. (20th May 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Five-Year Follow-up of Minimally Invasive Distal Metatarsal Chevron Osteotomy in Comparison with the Open Technique: A Randomized Controlled Trial. (20th May 2020)
- Main Title:
- Five-Year Follow-up of Minimally Invasive Distal Metatarsal Chevron Osteotomy in Comparison with the Open Technique
- Authors:
- Kaufmann, Gerhard
Mörtlbauer, Lorenz
Hofer-Picout, Philipp
Dammerer, Dietmar
Ban, Michael
Liebensteiner, Michael - Abstract:
- Abstract : Background: The aim of the present prospective randomized study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of minimally invasive chevron osteotomy as compared with open distal chevron osteotomy for the correction of hallux valgus deformity. Methods: A randomized controlled design was applied. The following parameters were assessed at 6 and 12 weeks, 9 months, and 5 years postoperatively: the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) Forefoot Score, a visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain, and a patient-satisfaction score. In addition, several radiographic parameters for hallux valgus correction and joint degeneration were collected. Range of motion was also assessed. Thirty-nine of 47 feet were available for analysis at the time of the latest follow-up. Results: During the 5-year study period, the outcomes of the minimally invasive technique were comparable with those of the open technique. No significant differences were seen between the 2 groups within 5 years postoperatively in terms of clinical outcomes (VAS, AOFAS, satisfaction), radiographic outcomes, joint degeneration, or range of motion. Conclusions: Five years after treatment, the outcome following minimally invasive distal chevron osteotomy is comparable with that for the open technique for hallux valgus surgery. Levels of Evidence: Therapeutic Level I . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of bone and joint surgery. Volume 102:Number 10(2020)
- Journal:
- Journal of bone and joint surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 102:Number 10(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 102, Issue 10 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 102
- Issue:
- 10
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0102-0010-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2020-05-20
- Subjects:
- Bones -- Surgery -- Periodicals
Joints -- Surgery -- Periodicals
Orthopedics -- Periodicals
Orthopedics
General Surgery
Bone Diseases
Joint Diseases
Bones -- Surgery
Joints -- Surgery
Orthopedics
Bot (anatomie)
Gewrichten
Chirurgie (geneeskunde)
Periodicals
Electronic journals
Periodicals
617.47005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/00219355 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/00219355 ↗
http://www.ejbjs.org/contents-by-date.0.dtl ↗
http://gateway.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&PAGE=toc&D=ovft&MODE=ovid&NEWS=N&AN=00002060-000000000-00000 ↗
http://journals.lww.com/pages/default.aspx ↗ - DOI:
- 10.2106/JBJS.19.00981 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0021-9355
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4954.250000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 18773.xml