Impact of sharing electronic health records with patients on the quality and safety of care: a systematic review and narrative synthesis protocol. Issue 8 (13th August 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Neves, Ana Luisa; Carter, Alexander W; Freise, Lisa; Laranjo, Liliana; Darzi, Ara; Mayer, Erik K
• Is Part Of: BMJ open. Volume 8:Issue 8(2018)
• Publication Date: 2018-08-13
• Subjects: health informatics -- information technology -- quality in health care -- health policy; Medicine -- Research -- Periodicals; 610.72
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020387
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2044-6055

Abstract

Abstract : Introduction: Providing patients with access to electronic health records (EHRs) has emerged as a promising solution to improve quality of care and safety. As the efforts to develop and implement EHR-based data sharing platforms mature and scale up worldwide, there is a need to evaluate the impact of these interventions and to weigh their relative risks and benefits, in order to inform evidence-based health policies. The aim of this work is to systematically characterise and appraise the demonstrated benefits and risks of sharing EHR with patients, by mapping them across the six domains of quality of care of the Institute of Medicine (IOM) analytical framework (ie, patient-centredness, effectiveness, efficiency, timeliness, equity and safety). Methods and analysis: CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase, HMIC, Medline/PubMed and PsycINFO databases will be searched from January 1997 to August 2017. Primary outcomes will include measures related with the six domains of quality of care of the IOM analytical framework. The quality of the studies will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool, the ROBINS-I Tool and the Drummond's checklist. A narrative synthesis will be conducted for all included studies. Subgroup analysis will be performed by domain of quality of care domain and by time scale (ie, short-term, medium-term or long-term impact). The body of evidence will be summarised in a Summary of Findings table and its strength assessed according to the GRADE criteria. Ethics and dissemination: This review does not require ethical approval as it will summarise published studies with non-identifiable data. This protocol complies with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses Protocols guidelines. Findings will be disseminated widely through peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations, and patient partners will be included in summarising the research findings into lay summaries and reports. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42017070092.