Comparing the effects of infrastructure on bicycling injury at intersections and non-intersections using a case–crossover design. Issue 5 (14th February 2013)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Comparing the effects of infrastructure on bicycling injury at intersections and non-intersections using a case–crossover design. Issue 5 (14th February 2013)
- Main Title:
- Comparing the effects of infrastructure on bicycling injury at intersections and non-intersections using a case–crossover design
- Authors:
- Harris, M Anne
Reynolds, Conor C O
Winters, Meghan
Cripton, Peter A
Shen, Hui
Chipman, Mary L
Cusimano, Michael D
Babul, Shelina
Brubacher, Jeffrey R
Friedman, Steven M
Hunte, Garth
Monro, Melody
Vernich, Lee
Teschke, Kay - Abstract:
- Abstract : Background: This study examined the impact of transportation infrastructure at intersection and non-intersection locations on bicycling injury risk. Methods: In Vancouver and Toronto, we studied adult cyclists who were injured and treated at a hospital emergency department. A case–crossover design compared the infrastructure of injury and control sites within each injured bicyclist's route. Intersection injury sites (N=210) were compared to randomly selected intersection control sites (N=272). Non-intersection injury sites (N=478) were compared to randomly selected non-intersection control sites (N=801). Results: At intersections, the types of routes meeting and the intersection design influenced safety. Intersections of two local streets (no demarcated traffic lanes) had approximately one-fifth the risk (adjusted OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.66) of intersections of two major streets (more than two traffic lanes). Motor vehicle speeds less than 30 km/h also reduced risk (adjusted OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.92). Traffic circles (small roundabouts) on local streets increased the risk of these otherwise safe intersections (adjusted OR 7.98, 95% CI 1.79 to 35.6). At non-intersection locations, very low risks were found for cycle tracks (bike lanes physically separated from motor vehicle traffic; adjusted OR 0.05, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.59) and local streets with diverters that reduce motor vehicle traffic (adjusted OR 0.04, 95% CI 0.003 to 0.60). Downhill grades increased risksAbstract : Background: This study examined the impact of transportation infrastructure at intersection and non-intersection locations on bicycling injury risk. Methods: In Vancouver and Toronto, we studied adult cyclists who were injured and treated at a hospital emergency department. A case–crossover design compared the infrastructure of injury and control sites within each injured bicyclist's route. Intersection injury sites (N=210) were compared to randomly selected intersection control sites (N=272). Non-intersection injury sites (N=478) were compared to randomly selected non-intersection control sites (N=801). Results: At intersections, the types of routes meeting and the intersection design influenced safety. Intersections of two local streets (no demarcated traffic lanes) had approximately one-fifth the risk (adjusted OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.66) of intersections of two major streets (more than two traffic lanes). Motor vehicle speeds less than 30 km/h also reduced risk (adjusted OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.92). Traffic circles (small roundabouts) on local streets increased the risk of these otherwise safe intersections (adjusted OR 7.98, 95% CI 1.79 to 35.6). At non-intersection locations, very low risks were found for cycle tracks (bike lanes physically separated from motor vehicle traffic; adjusted OR 0.05, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.59) and local streets with diverters that reduce motor vehicle traffic (adjusted OR 0.04, 95% CI 0.003 to 0.60). Downhill grades increased risks at both intersections and non-intersections. Conclusions: These results provide guidance for transportation planners and engineers: at local street intersections, traditional stops are safer than traffic circles, and at non-intersections, cycle tracks alongside major streets and traffic diversion from local streets are safer than no bicycle infrastructure. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Injury prevention. Volume 19:Issue 5(2013)
- Journal:
- Injury prevention
- Issue:
- Volume 19:Issue 5(2013)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 19, Issue 5 (2013)
- Year:
- 2013
- Volume:
- 19
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2013-0019-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- 303
- Page End:
- 310
- Publication Date:
- 2013-02-14
- Subjects:
- Children's accidents -- Prevention -- Periodicals
Accidents -- Prevention -- Periodicals
617.1 - Journal URLs:
- http://ip.bmjjournals.com ↗
http://www.injuryprevention.com ↗
http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/injuryprev-2012-040561 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1353-8047
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 18755.xml