P29 Best practice guidance for dietary assessment in research: DIET@NET Guidelines. (13th September 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Albar, S; Robinson, S; Alwan, N; Burley, V; Finglas, P; Harvey, L; Johnson, L; Ness, A; Page, P; Roberts, K; Roe, M; Steer, T; Wark, P; Cade, J
• Is Part Of: Journal of epidemiology and community health. Volume 70(2016)Supplement 1
• Page Start: A66
• Page End: A67
• Publication Date: 2016-09-13
• Subjects: Public health -- Periodicals; Epidemiology -- Periodicals; 614.4
• DOI: 10.1136/jech-2016-208064.128
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0143-005X

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Accurate assessment of dietary intake is important for planning, implementing of health promotion and when evaluating the effectiveness of public health interventions. However, measuring dietary intake is one of the most challenging aspects of public health research as no dietary method can measure dietary intake without error. Therefore, strategies that support researchers to choose the most appropriate dietary assessment method will help to strengthen research in this field. This study, undertaken for the Diet@net consortium aims to establish expert consensus on best practice guidelines (BPG) for carrying out dietary assessment in order to help non-experts in collecting dietary information. Methods: The guidelines were developed through a Delphi consultation technique (Moher recommendations). Two Delphi rounds were conducted using self-administered questionnaires, asking for prioritisation of suggested guidelines. Twelve expert members of the BPG-working group reviewed findings from participants and finalised the guidelines. Results: One hundred and thirty- experts were invited to take part, of whom 65 agreed to participate. Forty-eight completed Delphi-I and 51 Delphi-II. Overall, a total of 57 experts from different countries contributed feedback; these included nutritional epidemiologists, statisticians, and public health specialists. Initially, 47 statements were included in the guidelines. Following both Delphi rounds this was reduced to 43. The final consensus BPG includes four main stages with eight sub-sections. These stages are summarised as follows: Stage I. researchers need to define what is to be measured in terms of dietary intake to guide the choice of the most suitable Dietary Assessment Tool (DAT). Considering the 'who?', 'what?', and 'when?' of the study participants. Stage II. Investigate different types of DAT and appraise their appropriateness for the research question. Stage III. Evaluate existing tools to fine-tune choice of the most appropriate DAT by evaluating published validation studies, and considering the need for any modification or updating of the existing tools. Stage IV. Think about the implementation of the chosen DATs in the population of interest. Also, by addressing the source and range of the potential biases when using chosen DAT, aiming to minimise these where possible. Conclusion: Delphi techniques allowed us to synthesise experts' consensus on best practice in assessing dietary intake. The BPG will help non-expert researchers to consider key factors when selecting a DAT. These guidelines will be included on the Nutritools website (http://www.food.leeds.ac.uk/nutritools ). Nutritools will host interactive dietary assessment tools and guidance for nutrition researchers, healthcare practitioners and other scientists.