Patient-physician discordance in assessment of adherence to inhaled controller medication: a cross-sectional analysis of two cohorts. Issue 11 (7th November 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Patient-physician discordance in assessment of adherence to inhaled controller medication: a cross-sectional analysis of two cohorts. Issue 11 (7th November 2019)
- Main Title:
- Patient-physician discordance in assessment of adherence to inhaled controller medication: a cross-sectional analysis of two cohorts
- Authors:
- Jácome, Cristina
Pereira, Ana Margarida
Almeida, Rute
Ferreira-Magalhaes, Manuel
Couto, Mariana
Araujo, Luís
Pereira, Mariana
Correia, Magna Alves
Loureiro, Cláudia Chaves
Catarata, Maria Joana
Maia Santos, Lília
Pereira, João
Ramos, Bárbara
Lopes, Cristina
Mendes, Ana
Cidrais Rodrigues, José Carlos
Oliveira, Georgeta
Aguiar, Ana Paula
Afonso, Ivete
Carvalho, Joana
Arrobas, Ana
Coutinho Costa, José
Dias, Joana
Todo Bom, Ana
Azevedo, João
Ribeiro, Carmelita
Alves, Marta
Leiria Pinto, Paula
Neuparth, Nuno
Palhinha, Ana
Gaspar Marques, João
Pinto, Nicole
Martins, Pedro
Todo Bom, Filipa
Alvarenga Santos, Maria
Gomes Costa, Alberto
Silva Neto, Armandina
Santalha, Marta
Lozoya, Carlos
Santos, Natacha
Silva, Diana
Vasconcelos, Maria João
Taborda-Barata, Luís
Carvalhal, Célia
Teixeira, Maria Fernanda
Alves, Rodrigo Rodrigues
Moreira, Ana Sofia
Sofia Pinto, Cláudia
Morais Silva, Pedro
Alves, Carlos
Câmara, Raquel
Coelho, Didina
Bordalo, Diana
Fernandes, Ricardo M
Ferreira, Rosário
Menezes, Fernando
Gomes, Ricardo
Calix, Maria José
Marques, Ana
Cardoso, João
Emiliano, Madalena
Gerardo, Rita
Nunes, Carlos
Câmara, Rita
Ferreira, José Alberto
Carvalho, Aurora
Freitas, Paulo
Correia, Ricardo
Fonseca, Joao A
… (more) - Abstract:
- Abstract : Objective: We aimed to compare patient's and physician's ratings of inhaled medication adherence and to identify predictors of patient-physician discordance. Design: Baseline data from two prospective multicentre observational studies. Setting: 29 allergy, pulmonology and paediatric secondary care outpatient clinics in Portugal. Participants: 395 patients (≥13 years old) with persistent asthma. Measures: Data on demographics, patient-physician relationship, upper airway control, asthma control, asthma treatment, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1 ) and healthcare use were collected. Patients and physicians independently assessed adherence to inhaled controller medication during the previous week using a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Discordance was defined as classification in distinct VAS categories (low 0–50; medium 51–80; high 81–100) or as an absolute difference in VAS scores ≥10 mm. Correlation between patients' and physicians' VAS scores/categories was explored. A multinomial logistic regression identified the predictors of physician overestimation and underestimation. Results: High inhaler adherence was reported both by patients (median (percentile 25 to percentile 75) 85 (65–95) mm; 53% VAS>80) and by physicians (84 (68–95) mm; 53% VAS>80). Correlation between patient and physician VAS scores was moderate (rs =0.580; p<0.001). Discordance occurred in 56% of cases: in 28% physicians overestimated adherence and in 27% underestimated. LowAbstract : Objective: We aimed to compare patient's and physician's ratings of inhaled medication adherence and to identify predictors of patient-physician discordance. Design: Baseline data from two prospective multicentre observational studies. Setting: 29 allergy, pulmonology and paediatric secondary care outpatient clinics in Portugal. Participants: 395 patients (≥13 years old) with persistent asthma. Measures: Data on demographics, patient-physician relationship, upper airway control, asthma control, asthma treatment, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1 ) and healthcare use were collected. Patients and physicians independently assessed adherence to inhaled controller medication during the previous week using a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Discordance was defined as classification in distinct VAS categories (low 0–50; medium 51–80; high 81–100) or as an absolute difference in VAS scores ≥10 mm. Correlation between patients' and physicians' VAS scores/categories was explored. A multinomial logistic regression identified the predictors of physician overestimation and underestimation. Results: High inhaler adherence was reported both by patients (median (percentile 25 to percentile 75) 85 (65–95) mm; 53% VAS>80) and by physicians (84 (68–95) mm; 53% VAS>80). Correlation between patient and physician VAS scores was moderate (rs =0.580; p<0.001). Discordance occurred in 56% of cases: in 28% physicians overestimated adherence and in 27% underestimated. Low adherence as assessed by the physician (OR=27.35 (9.85 to 75.95)), FEV1 ≥80% (OR=2.59 (1.08 to 6.20)) and a first appointment (OR=5.63 (1.24 to 25.56)) were predictors of underestimation. An uncontrolled asthma (OR=2.33 (1.25 to 4.34)), uncontrolled upper airway disease (OR=2.86 (1.35 to 6.04)) and prescription of short-acting beta-agonists alone (OR=3.05 (1.15 to 8.08)) were associated with overestimation. Medium adherence as assessed by the physician was significantly associated with higher risk of discordance, both for overestimation and underestimation of adherence (OR=14.50 (6.04 to 34.81); OR=2.21 (1.07 to 4.58)), while having a written action plan decreased the likelihood of discordance (OR=0.25 (0.12 to 0.52); OR=0.41 (0.22 to 0.78)) (R 2 =44%). Conclusion: Although both patients and physicians report high inhaler adherence, discordance occurred in half of cases. Implementation of objective adherence measures and effective communication are needed to improve patient-physician agreement. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- BMJ open. Volume 9:Issue 11(2019)
- Journal:
- BMJ open
- Issue:
- Volume 9:Issue 11(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 9, Issue 11 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 9
- Issue:
- 11
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0009-0011-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2019-11-07
- Subjects:
- asthma -- medication adherence -- discordance -- logistic models
Medicine -- Research -- Periodicals
610.72 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗
http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031732 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2044-6055
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 18756.xml