Validation of the general self-efficacy scale in french students for the prevention of student health. (13th April 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Saleh, D.; Romo, L.; Sweerts, S. Julien
• Is Part Of: European psychiatry. Volume 64:Supplement 1(2021)
• Page Start: S459
• Page End: S459
• Publication Date: 2021-04-13
• Subjects: measure -- General Self-Efficacy -- Prevention of mental health -- stress; Psychiatry -- Periodicals; Mental illness -- Periodicals; Electronic journals; 616.89
• DOI: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2021.1226
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0924-9338

Abstract

Abstract : Introduction: The perceived self-efficacy, framed by Bandura, is one of the most important concepts within Cognitive Social (Villegas Barahona et al., 2018). General self-efficacy is defined, as the global confidence a person has in order to perform tasks successfully (Stanley & Murphy, 1997). The perception of stress may be more for people with lower level of self-efficacy (Shilpa & Prasad, 2017). Objectives: Students often suffer from stress (Saleh et al., 2019) and student health intervention and prevention programs must therefore act on this variable. The French version the General Self-Efficacy Scale could be an element for the validation of these programs. Methods: 955 French students aged 17 to 67 (M = 22.22; SD = 5.1) participated to the study. We performed an Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) to determine the most appropriate factor structure then a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). Results: Kaiser's criterion pointed towards a one-factor model while Cattel's criterion pointed towards a two-factor solution. Both models have been tested and the two-factor model seemed to be better. Indices showed an excellent fit between the model and the data (CFI = 0.97, TLI = 0.96, SRMR = 0.035). Conclusions: We have tested two models and one of them, the two-factor model, presented better psychometric qualities. However, the one-factor result is also satisfactory and it will be discussed in the communication.