PKP-010 Levetiracetam clinical pharmacokinetics in elderly patients with epilepsy. (25th February 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Alzueta, N; Riestra, AC; Egüés, A; Idoate, A; Aldaz, A
• Is Part Of: European journal of hospital pharmacy. Volume 24(2017)Supplement 1
• Page Start: A197
• Page End: A198
• Publication Date: 2017-02-25
• Subjects: Pharmacy -- Periodicals; Hospital pharmacies -- Periodicals; 615.1
• DOI: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2017-000640.438
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2047-9956

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Levetiracetam (LEV) is increasingly used in the elderly due to a favourable pharmacokinetic profile, good tolerability and no significant drug–drug interactions. LEV is renally excreted, and its clearance is expected to decrease during old age because of the physiological reduction in glomerular filtration rate. Purpose: To compare apparent steady state oral clearance of levetiracetam (LEV CL/F) in elderly versus non-elderly patients with epilepsy. Material and methods: This was a retrospective study from 2009 to 2013 in 380 adult patients with epilepsy treated with LEV. Inclusion criteria: age ≥16 years; treatment with LEV for at least 1 month; and venous blood sampling before the first morning dose of LEV. Variables collected were dose, serum concentration, age, sex, body weight and anticonvulsant comedications prescribed. They were obtained from the therapeutic drug monitoring register and the medical records. Patients were grouped according to age: group A (16–30 years, n=93), group B (31–50 years, n=131), group C (51–65 years, n=90) and group D (>65 years, n=66). In group D, 15.15% of patients had impaired renal function (creatinine clearance <50 mL/min). Serum concentrations of LEV were measured by high performance liquid chromatography with spectrophotometric detection. Stata version 12 software was used for statistical analysis. Results: Mean basal LEV serum concentrations (µg/mL) significantly increased with age. We compared group A (13.32±4.54) versus B (14.01±6.43) (NS); group A vs C (17.54±5.45) (p<0.0001) and group A vs D (20.21±8.34) (p<0.0001). Hence we compared younger patients (groups A and B; 13.66±5.48) versus group C (p<0.0001) and group D (p<0.0001). Mean weight normalised LEV CL/F (mL/min/kg) progressively decreased with age. We compared group A (1.45±0.76) versus B (1.41±0.85) (NS); group A versus C (1.18±0.83) (p<0.0001) and group A versus D (0.95±0.68) (p<0.0001). We also compared group A versus D without patients with impaired renal function (0.98±0.58) (p<0.0001). Finally, we compared non-elderly patients (groups A and B; 1.43±0.81) versus group C (p<0.0001) and group D (p<0.0001). Conclusion: LEV CL/F significantly declined with ageing, with a reduction in median values ranging from 20% in patients aged 50–65 years to 35% in those over 65 years compared with non-elderly patients. To achieve a given serum drug concentration, LEV dose should be reduced by around 30% in elderly patients compared with younger subjects. No conflict of interest