Racial Disparities in Resection of Early Stage Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: Variability Among Surgeons. Issue 4 (April 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ezer, Nicole; Mhango, Grace; Bagiella, Emilia; Goodman, Emily; Flores, Raja; Wisnivesky, Juan P.
• Is Part Of: Medical care. Volume 58:Issue 4(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-04
• Subjects: race -- lung cancer -- lobectomy -- disparities -- stereotyping -- bias -- thoracic surgery; Economics, Medical -- Periodicals; Insurance, Health -- Periodicals; Santé, Services de -- Administration -- Périodiques; Soins médicaux -- Périodiques; Medical economics -- Periodicals; Health insurance -- Periodicals; Medical economics -- United States -- Periodicals; Health insurance -- United States -- Periodicals; Comprehensive Health Care -- Periodicals; Personal Health Services -- Periodicals; Gezondheidszorg; Économie de la santé -- Périodiques; Santé, Services de -- Périodiques; Health insurance; Medical economics; United States; Periodicals; 362.10973
• DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001280
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0025-7079

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Racial disparities in resection of non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are well documented. Patient-level and system-level factors only partially explain these findings. Although physician-related factors have been suggested as mediators, empirical evidence for their contribution is limited. Objective: To determine if racial disparities in receipt of thoracic surgery persisted after patients had a surgical consultation and whether there was a physician contribution to disparities in care. Methods: The authors identified 19, 624 patients with stage I-II NSCLC above 65 years of age from the Surveillance-Epidemiology and End-Results-Medicare database. They studied black and white patients evaluated by a surgeon within 6 months of diagnosis. They assessed for racial differences in resection rates among surgeons using hierarchical linear modeling. Our main outcome was receipt of NSCLC resection. A random intercept was included to test for variability in resection rates across surgeons. Interaction between patient race and the random surgeon intercept was used to evaluate for heterogeneity between surgeons in resection rates for black versus white patients. Results: After surgical consultation, black patients were less likely to undergo resection (adjusted odds ratio, 0.57; 95% confidence interval, 0.47–0.69). Resection rates varied significantly between surgeons ( P <0.001). A significant interaction between the surgeon intercept and race ( P <0.05) showed variability beyond chance across surgeons in resection rates of black versus white patients. When the model included thoracic surgery specifalization the physician contribution to disparities in care was decreased. Conclusions: Racial disparities in resection of NSCLC exist even among patients who had access to a surgeon. Heterogeneity between surgeons in resection rates between black and white patients suggests a physician's contribution to observed racial disparities. Specialization in thoracic surgery attenuated this contribution.