Change in the use of remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices in Italian clinical practice over a 5-year period: results of two surveys promoted by the AIAC (Italian Association of Arrhythmology and Cardiac Pacing). Issue 4 (April 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Palmisano, Pietro; Melissano, Donato; Zanotto, Gabriele; Perego, Giovanni Battista; Toselli, Tiziano; Landolina, Maurizio; Ricci, Renato Pietro
• Is Part Of: Journal of cardiovascular medicine. Volume 21:Issue 4(2020:Apr.)
• Publication Date: 2020-04
• Subjects: AIAC survey -- atrial fibrillation -- cardiac implantable electronic device -- cardiac resynchronization therapy -- implantable cardioverter defibrillator -- pacemaker -- remote monitoring -- telemonitoring; Cardiology -- Periodicals; Cardiovascular system -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Cardiology -- Periodicals; Cardiovascular Diseases -- Periodicals; 616.1005
• DOI: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000000950
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1558-2027

Abstract

Abstract : Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of remote monitoring in Italian clinical practice and its trend over the last 5 years. Methods: In 2012 and 2017, two surveys were conducted. Both were open to all Italian implanting centres and consisted of 25 questions on the characteristics of the centre, their actual use of remote monitoring, applied organizational models and administrative and legal aspects. Results: The questionnaires were completed by 132 and 108 centres in 2012 and 2017, respectively (30.6 and 24.7% of all Italian implanting centres). In 2017, significantly fewer centres followed up fewer than 200 patients by remote monitoring than in 2012, while more followed up more than 500 patients (all P < 0.005). In most of the centres (77.6%) that responded to both surveys, the number of patients remotely monitored significantly increased from 2012 to 2017. In both surveys, remote monitoring was usually managed by physicians and nurses. Over the period, primary review of transmissions by physicians declined, while it was increasingly performed by nurses; the involvement of technicians rose, while that of manufacturers' technical personnel decreased. The percentage of centres in which transmissions were submitted to the physician only in critical cases rose (from 28.3 to 64.3%; P < 0.001). In 86.7% of centres, the lack of a reimbursement system was deemed the main barrier to implementing remote monitoring. Conclusion: In the last 5 years, the number of patients followed up by remote monitoring has increased markedly. In most Italian centres, remote monitoring has increasingly been managed through a primary nursing model. The lack of a specific reimbursement system is perceived as the main barrier to implementing remote monitoring . Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text