Deliver Me from food waste: Model framework for comparing the energy use of meal-kit delivery and groceries. (1st November 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Gee, Isabella M.; Davidson, F. Todd; Speetles, Brittany L.; Webber, Michael E.
• Is Part Of: Journal of cleaner production. Volume 236(2019)
• Publication Date: 2019-11-01
• Subjects: Energy -- Food -- Meal-kit -- Supply chain -- Delivery -- E-commerce; Factory and trade waste -- Management -- Periodicals; Manufactures -- Environmental aspects -- Periodicals; Déchets industriels -- Gestion -- Périodiques; Usines -- Aspect de l'environnement -- Périodiques; 628.5
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.07.062
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0959-6526

Abstract

Abstract: This work shares a model that was developed to compare the energy requirements of meal-kit delivery systems to conventional grocery shopping. Meal-kit services can reduce food waste because the kits pre-portion ingredients for each recipe, thereby saving energy. However, the supply chain and packaging requirements of meal-kit delivery are different than those for grocery stores, potentially offsetting any energetic benefits of reduced food waste. If meal-kit delivery replaces some trips to the grocery store, then transportation-related savings might be significant. The tradeoffs of these competing effects are non-obvious, so mass and energy balances were used to assess embedded energy in both pathways. The model was illustrated under representative operating conditions for a consumer in Austin, Texas using Monte Carlo simulation. Both per-meal and per-week, a meal-kit delivery service meal is more energy intensive than procuring the same meal from conventional grocery stores primarily due to single-use packaging. Consumer transportation to the grocery store was also found to be particularly energy intensive. These results suggest that the energetic requirements of meal-kit delivery services could be reduced such that they are less than conventional grocery shopping if reusable or low-impact packaging is used, and if the delivery services are able to reduce the number of weekly trips to the grocery store. 2 Highlights: Meal-kit delivery might require more energy than groceries, per-meal and per-week. Disposable packaging can represent over 50% of per-meal energy use for meal-kits. Consumer transportation to the store plays a significant role in energy use. Possible meal-kit energy benefits are case specific based on consumer behavior. Modifications to packaging and transport could make meal-kits preferable.