Alternative assays to dRVVT and aPTT for lupus anticoagulant detection. Issue 8 (12th May 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Moore, Gary W.
• Is Part Of: American journal of hematology. Volume 95:Issue 8(2020:Aug.)
• Page Start: 992
• Page End: 998
• Publication Date: 2020-05-12
• Subjects: Hematology -- Periodicals; 616.15
• DOI: 10.1002/ajh.25836
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0361-8609

Abstract

Abstract: Lupus anticoagulants (LA) are heterogeneous antibodies and no single assay will detect every LA. Consequently, testing is commonly undertaken with both dilute Russell's viper venom time (dRVVT) and LA‐responsive activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) to maximize detection rates. Although a huge body of evidence attests to the diagnostic utility of these assays, they have limitations that can render them unreliable in certain circumstances. Other assays are available for detecting LA but unfamiliarity, variable availability and technical concerns expressed in guidelines contribute to less usage than dRVVT and aPTT. However, assays such as Taipan snake venom time and Textarin time are insensitive to anticoagulants that compromise dRVVT and aPTT, and assays such as dilute prothrombin time can detect LA unreactive in dRVVT and aPTT. The pros and cons of alternative assays to dRVVT and APTT for LA detection are discussed.