Risk-based cost-benefit analysis for the retrofit of bridges exposed to extreme hydrologic events considering multiple failure modes. (15th March 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Mondoro, Alysson; Frangopol, Dan M.
• Is Part Of: Engineering structures. Volume 159(2018)
• Page Start: 310
• Page End: 319
• Publication Date: 2018-03-15
• Subjects: Risk -- Extreme hydrologic event -- Cost-benefit ratio -- Bridge management -- Flood -- Scour; Structural engineering -- Periodicals; Structural analysis (Engineering) -- Periodicals; Construction, Technique de la -- Périodiques; Génie parasismique -- Périodiques; Pression du vent -- Périodiques; Earthquake engineering; Structural engineering; Wind-pressure; Periodicals; 624.105
• DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.12.029
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0141-0296

Abstract

Highlights: Novel risk assessment framework for bridges exposed to extreme hydrologic events. Use of event tree to account for different consequences of failure. Cost-benefit analysis for prioritizing bridge retrofits and the importance of considering all failure modes. The importance of site-specific hazard assessment on the profitability of retrofit plans. Abstract: Bridges exposed to flooding, hurricanes, tsunamis, and other extreme hydrologic events have been observed to fail due to deck dislodgement, pier failure, or foundation failure. However, the risk assessment and retrofit methodologies for these bridges have typically only been developed around a single failure mode. This paper addresses this gap by integrating the three observed failure modes for bridges vulnerable to extreme hydraulic events into a comprehensive risk assessment framework. Through the use of an event tree, the methodology accounts for the different consequences of failure associated with different failure modes. Bridge management strategies are investigated to determine the effectiveness of the retrofit actions with respect to their benefit (i.e. reduction in risk) and costs. An illustrative example for riverine bridges under various exposure scenarios is presented. The risk assessment and benefit-cost analysis elucidate the need to incorporate all pertinent failure modes of the structure by highlighting the competing nature of different failure modes. The illustrative example shows that the effective management of structures is site-specific and, that the intensity of the hazard at the bridge location affects which management strategy is preferred. The sensitivity to exposure level indicates that the optimal management of the structure should incorporate considerations for potential future changes in the intensity and frequency of the hazard.