Evaluating Surgery Resident Technical Skills: Intestinal Anastomosis in a Porcine Model. Issue 11 (November 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hyde, G. Alan; Soder, Brent L.; Stanley, J. Daniel; Dart, Benjamin W.; Holcombe, Jenny M.; Cook, Richard G.; Burns, R. Phillip; Nelson, Eric C.
• Is Part Of: American surgeon. Volume 84:Issue 11(2018)
• Page Start: 1801
• Page End: 1807
• Publication Date: 2018-11
• Subjects: Surgery -- Periodicals; Surgery -- United States -- Periodicals; 617.0973
• DOI: 10.1177/000313481808401139
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0003-1348

Abstract

Because work hour restrictions and technological developments such as staplers change the surgical landscape, efficient resident training methods are necessary to ensure surgical quality. This study evaluates efficacy of a porcine skills laboratory for teaching surgery residents to perform handsewn intestinal anastomoses based on a validated subjective tool and novel objective measurements. We hypothesized that resident performance would improve postintervention; junior residents would improve more than the seniors would. This prospective study was completed over a period of four months in 2015. Participants performed standardized two-layer, handsewn, end-to-end small intestine anastomosis in a live porcine model before (pretest) and after (posttest) an educational intervention. The intervention consisted of an instructional module and skills laboratory teaching session by attending surgeons. Participants were evaluated based on objective measurements of the anastomosis and blinded video evaluations using objective structured assessment of technical skills. Twenty-eight residents in a six-year general surgery program started and completed the study. The objective structured assessment of technical skills ratings demonstrated that the whole resident cohort had statistically significant improvement in pre- to posttest scores, 11.16 to 24.59 ( P < 0.001). Junior and senior residents improved independently, 9.59 versus 22.53 ( P < 0.001) and 13.59 versus 27.77 ( P < 0.001), respectively. Finally, the cohort significantly improved in number of full-thickness Lembert sutures (2.36 vs 0.93, P = 0.001) and time to completion (31.28 vs 28.2 minutes, P = 0.046). Anastomotic leak pressure, anastomotic narrowing, and anastomotic tensile strength all trended toward improvement. A structured educational intervention, teaching intestinal anastomosis in a live porcine model produced significant improvement in residents' technical skills.