Workforce Models to Screen for and Address Patients' Unmet Social Needs in the Clinic Setting: A Scoping Review. (May 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sandhu, Sahil; Xu, Jacqueline; Eisenson, Howard; Prvu Bettger, Janet
• Is Part Of: Journal of primary care & community health. Volume 12(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-05
• Subjects: scoping review -- social determinants of health -- workforce -- screening -- ambulatory care; Primary health care -- Periodicals; Primary health care -- United States -- Periodicals; Community health services -- Periodicals; Community health services -- United States -- Periodicals; 362.12
• DOI: 10.1177/21501327211021021
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2150-1319

Abstract

Objectives: While healthcare organizations increasingly aim to address the social determinants of health (SDOH) in the clinic setting, there is little guidance on which staff are best equipped to assume this role. The present study is a scoping review of the peer-reviewed literature to characterize workforce models used to screen for and respond to patients' unmet social needs in ambulatory settings. Methods: Four online databases were used to identify papers published until February 2021. Eligible articles were original research studies or systematic reviews that described the implementation of a standardized assessment for multiple SDOH domains and resulting activities to respond to individual patient needs (eg, referral to community resources) in ambulatory care settings. Results: Of the 1569 articles identified, 65 met study eligibility criteria. Majority of studies had observational study designs (11% were randomized control trials). For screening-related activities, more articles reported using traditional healthcare staff (51%), such as medical providers, medical assistants, and front-desk staff, than social care staff (32%), such as social workers and student volunteers. In contrast, for response-related activities, more articles reported using social care staff (88%) than traditional healthcare staff (60%). While we found wide variations in specific team configurations and training for the roles, social care staff generally provided more intensive forms of assistance than traditional healthcare staff. Conclusion: While this review demonstrates the breadth of models for building or deploying a workforce to integrate health and social care, it also identifies the need for rigorous research on workforce development, implementation, and effectiveness.