Anatomical variations of the circle of Willis and their prevalence, with a focus on the posterior communicating artery: A literature review and meta‐analysis. Issue 7 (6th August 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Jones, Joshua D.; Castanho, Pedro; Bazira, Peter; Sanders, Katherine
• Is Part Of: Clinical anatomy. Volume 34:Issue 7(2021)
• Page Start: 978
• Page End: 990
• Publication Date: 2020-08-06
• Subjects: cerebral arterial circle -- circle of Willis -- communicating -- hypoplasia -- posterior -- variation; Anatomy -- Periodicals; Anatomy -- Periodicals; 611
• DOI: 10.1002/ca.23662
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0897-3806

Abstract

Abstract: The circle of Willis is an anastomotic network of arteries surrounding the base of the brain, providing collateral circulation to prevent ischemia. It has, however, long been established that it exhibits considerable anatomical variation when compared to Thomas Willis' originally described circle. This study aimed primarily to determine an accurate prevalence of the variation of the circle of Willis in the general population and the prevalence of common posterior communicating artery variations. Additional aims were to explain why such a wide range of reported variations exist, and whether different types of studies report significantly different prevalence of variation. A comprehensive literature search identified 764 papers. A three‐phase screening process was undertaken, involving a critical analysis of papers, and a total of 33 papers were selected for analysis and literature review. A descriptive statistics test with bootstrap was performed to estimate the average prevalence of variations. The estimated prevalence of general variation, unilateral, and bilateral posterior communicating artery hypoplasia or aplasia was 68.22 ± 14.32%, 19.45 ± 8.63%, and 22.83 ± 14.58%, respectively. Over half of the population exhibit a circle of Willis with some form of variation. To provide a more accurate estimation for the prevalence of variations, a universal classification system needs to be established, collating all the work from high‐quality studies, to provide a comprehensive database of the circle's variations. Knowing the prevalence of variations and how they can impact neurosurgical approaches or patterns of ischemic pathology can be crucial in providing effective patient care.