Simulated dose painting of hypoxic sub-volumes in pancreatic cancer stereotactic body radiotherapy. (9th September 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Elamir, Ahmed M; Stanescu, Teodor; Shessel, Andrea; Tadic, Tony; Yeung, Ivan; Letourneau, Daniel; Kim, John; Lukovic, Jelena; Dawson, Laura A; Wong, Rebecca; Barry, Aisling; Brierley, James; Gallinger, Steven; Knox, Jennifer; O'Kane, Grainne; Dhani, Neesha; Hosni, Ali; Taylor, Edward
• Is Part Of: Physics in medicine & biology. Volume 66:Number 18(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-09-09
• Subjects: hypoxia -- pancreatic canacer -- dose painting -- SBRT; Biophysics -- Periodicals; Medical physics -- Periodicals; 610.153
• DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac215c
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0031-9155

Abstract

Abstract: Dose painting of hypoxic tumour sub-volumes using positron-emission tomography (PET) has been shown to improve tumour control in silico in several sites, predominantly head and neck and lung cancers. Pancreatic cancer presents a more stringent challenge, given its proximity to critical gastro-intestinal organs-at-risk (OARs), anatomic motion, and impediments to reliable PET hypoxia quantification. A radiobiological model was developed to estimate clonogen survival fraction (SF), using 18 F-fluoroazomycin arabinoside PET (FAZA PET) images from ten patients with unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma to quantify oxygen enhancement effects. For each patient, four simulated five-fraction stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) plans were generated: (1) a standard SBRT plan aiming to cover the planning target volume with 40 Gy, (2) dose painting plans delivering escalated doses to a maximum of three FAZA-avid hypoxic sub-volumes, (3) dose painting plans with simulated spacer separating the duodenum and pancreatic head, and (4), plans with integrated boosts to geometric contractions of the gross tumour volume (GTV). All plans saturated at least one OAR dose limit. SF was calculated for each plan and sensitivity of SF to simulated hypoxia quantification errors was evaluated. Dose painting resulted in a 55% reduction in SF as compared to standard SBRT; 78% with spacer. Integrated boosts to hypoxia-blind geometric contractions resulted in a 41% reduction in SF. The reduction in SF for dose-painting plans persisted for all hypoxia quantification parameters studied, including registration and rigid motion errors that resulted in shifts and rotations of the GTV and hypoxic sub-volumes by as much as 1 cm and 10 degrees. Although proximity to OARs ultimately limited dose escalation, with estimated SFs (∼10 −5 ) well above levels required to completely ablate a ∼10 cm 3 tumour, dose painting robustly reduced clonogen survival when accounting for expected treatment and imaging uncertainties and thus, may improve local response and associated morbidity.