Lithic utility and risk: Examining mid to late Holocene stone points from Australia with a utility model. (October 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Lithic utility and risk: Examining mid to late Holocene stone points from Australia with a utility model. (October 2021)
- Main Title:
- Lithic utility and risk: Examining mid to late Holocene stone points from Australia with a utility model
- Authors:
- Maloney, Tim Ryan
Hiscock, Peter - Abstract:
- Abstract: Archaeological evidence of technology reflects myriad influences on past life, including economic contexts and mobility, which remain at the forefront of archaeological science. Given that forager groups needed to anticipate future technological needs and often had to transport tools, provisioning was necessary to enhance foraging success. Scheduling of production ensures suitable tools were available, maintained, and transported to where they were needed. This study investigates these fundamentals of interpreting past technological organisation via a critical examination of transport utility measures detected amongst bifacial points of late Holocene Australia. By focussing on one widely adopted model of these utility measures, we offer a new perspective on quantifying tool provisioning and interpreting forager mobility. These bifacial points were systematically geared to produce small and light specimens with low utility. Thus, foragers employed a strategy that sacrificed the benefits of extended utility in risky economic contexts. In return, they benefitted from having small points capable of being hafted to composite tools, enhanced the performance of those composite tools, and were light enough to permit multiple composite tools to be carried across the mid to late Holocene landscape of north Western Australia. Highlights: A return to the theoretical contrast between realised and potential utility of stone tools. Stone points of Holocene Australia formed oneAbstract: Archaeological evidence of technology reflects myriad influences on past life, including economic contexts and mobility, which remain at the forefront of archaeological science. Given that forager groups needed to anticipate future technological needs and often had to transport tools, provisioning was necessary to enhance foraging success. Scheduling of production ensures suitable tools were available, maintained, and transported to where they were needed. This study investigates these fundamentals of interpreting past technological organisation via a critical examination of transport utility measures detected amongst bifacial points of late Holocene Australia. By focussing on one widely adopted model of these utility measures, we offer a new perspective on quantifying tool provisioning and interpreting forager mobility. These bifacial points were systematically geared to produce small and light specimens with low utility. Thus, foragers employed a strategy that sacrificed the benefits of extended utility in risky economic contexts. In return, they benefitted from having small points capable of being hafted to composite tools, enhanced the performance of those composite tools, and were light enough to permit multiple composite tools to be carried across the mid to late Holocene landscape of north Western Australia. Highlights: A return to the theoretical contrast between realised and potential utility of stone tools. Stone points of Holocene Australia formed one element of a mobile toolkit. Foraging strategy that sacrificed benefits of extended utility in risky Holocene contexts. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of archaeological science. Volume 134(2021)
- Journal:
- Journal of archaeological science
- Issue:
- Volume 134(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 134, Issue 2021 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 134
- Issue:
- 2021
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0134-2021-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2021-10
- Subjects:
- Stone tool technology -- Technological organization theory -- Australian archaeology
Archaeology -- Periodicals
Archéologie -- Périodiques
930.1 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/03054403 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org/journal=0305-4403;screen=info;ECOIP ↗
http://www.idealibrary.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.jas.2021.105467 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0305-4403
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4947.178000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 18630.xml