Quality control of microseismic P-phase arrival picks in coal mine based on machine learning. (November 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Quality control of microseismic P-phase arrival picks in coal mine based on machine learning. (November 2021)
- Main Title:
- Quality control of microseismic P-phase arrival picks in coal mine based on machine learning
- Authors:
- Zhu, Mengbo
Cheng, Jianyuan
Zhang, Zheng - Abstract:
- Abstract: Microseismic events generally contain strong noise-polluting and unobvious P-phase oscillating channel waveforms. The automatic P-phase arrival picking accuracy of these channel waveforms tends to be low, or even are false. Currently, unusable P-picks are not screened out automatically before geophysics inversions in most microseismic data processing software. Therefore, manual interventions are needed to remove or correct the unusable P-picks. However, rapidly increasing monitoring data causes manual handling to be time-consuming and lagging. Supervised machine learning (ML) is applied to distinguish useable and unusable P-picks automatically. Big data analysis revealed that the waveform features, including signal-to-noise ratio, signal-to-noise variance ratio, P-wave starting-up slope, and peak amplitude have impact on P-pick accuracy. In contrast, the effect of the short-time zero-crossing rate on the P-pick accuracy is not as obvious. Five P-pick quality control models were trained based on traditional machine learning approaches, including discriminant analysis, logistic regression, k-nearest neighbor, support vector machine, and Naive Bayes classifier. For these five models, the input data are P-pick labels and waveform features. In addition, another P-pick quality control model was trained based on convolutional neural network. While, the input data are P-pick images and labels. The training sets used in all six machine learning models are uniform. TheAbstract: Microseismic events generally contain strong noise-polluting and unobvious P-phase oscillating channel waveforms. The automatic P-phase arrival picking accuracy of these channel waveforms tends to be low, or even are false. Currently, unusable P-picks are not screened out automatically before geophysics inversions in most microseismic data processing software. Therefore, manual interventions are needed to remove or correct the unusable P-picks. However, rapidly increasing monitoring data causes manual handling to be time-consuming and lagging. Supervised machine learning (ML) is applied to distinguish useable and unusable P-picks automatically. Big data analysis revealed that the waveform features, including signal-to-noise ratio, signal-to-noise variance ratio, P-wave starting-up slope, and peak amplitude have impact on P-pick accuracy. In contrast, the effect of the short-time zero-crossing rate on the P-pick accuracy is not as obvious. Five P-pick quality control models were trained based on traditional machine learning approaches, including discriminant analysis, logistic regression, k-nearest neighbor, support vector machine, and Naive Bayes classifier. For these five models, the input data are P-pick labels and waveform features. In addition, another P-pick quality control model was trained based on convolutional neural network. While, the input data are P-pick images and labels. The training sets used in all six machine learning models are uniform. The testing experiments with uniform testing set show that the support vector machine generated best the performance among traditional machine learning approaches, with 82.81% accuracy. However, the convolutional neural network model generated outstanding performance in recognizing P-pick, with 91.71% accuracy. The automatic P-pick quality control method proposed in this study can facilitate the precision and efficiency of the automatic processing of microseismic signals. Highlights: The necessity of quality control of automatic picked P-phase arrival was discussed. Six machine learning classification models were trained aiming for P-pick quality control with a uniform training set. The testing experiments shows that P-pick model based on CNN generated best performance, with 91.71% accuracy. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Computers & geosciences. Volume 156(2021)
- Journal:
- Computers & geosciences
- Issue:
- Volume 156(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 156, Issue 2021 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 156
- Issue:
- 2021
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0156-2021-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2021-11
- Subjects:
- Coal mine -- Microseismic monitoring -- P-phase arrival -- Quality control -- Machine learning -- Convolutional neural network
Environmental policy -- Periodicals
550.5 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00983004 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.cageo.2021.104862 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0098-3004
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3394.695000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 18648.xml