Geologic CO2 Storage Optimization under Geomechanical Risk Using Coupled-Physics Models. (September 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Geologic CO2 Storage Optimization under Geomechanical Risk Using Coupled-Physics Models. (September 2021)
- Main Title:
- Geologic CO2 Storage Optimization under Geomechanical Risk Using Coupled-Physics Models
- Authors:
- Zheng, Fangning
Jahandideh, Atefeh
Jha, Birendra
Jafarpour, Behnam - Abstract:
- Highlights: Multi-objective optimization framework to maximize geologic CO2 storage in saline aquifers while accounting for the geomechanical risks Coupled flow and geomechanical simulation used to quantify the storage performance and the geomechanical risks associated with ground surface uplift and induced seismicity potential due to rock failure A range of trade-off solutions from optimization Pareto front enable well configurations that provide high storage capacity while adjusting the geomechanical risk to a desired level. Risk-informed solutions with coupled-physics models present optimization solutions that are different from those obtained from standard flow-only simulation approaches Abstract: Numerical simulation of fluid flow, transport, and trapping mechanisms have been used to optimize CO2 storage in geologic formations by improving trapping efficiency through injection strategies. Flow models, however, do not capture the geomechanical deformation that can occur during CO2 injection, including reservoir expansion, ground surface uplift, and induced seismicity. The geomechanical risks of CO2 injection have drawn more attention in recent years and coupled flow and geomechanical simulation models are increasingly used to study the geomechanical effects during CO2 injection, to ensure environmentally sound and safe operations. We present an optimization framework for geologic CO2 storage under geomechanical risks, where coupled flow-geomechanics simulations are usedHighlights: Multi-objective optimization framework to maximize geologic CO2 storage in saline aquifers while accounting for the geomechanical risks Coupled flow and geomechanical simulation used to quantify the storage performance and the geomechanical risks associated with ground surface uplift and induced seismicity potential due to rock failure A range of trade-off solutions from optimization Pareto front enable well configurations that provide high storage capacity while adjusting the geomechanical risk to a desired level. Risk-informed solutions with coupled-physics models present optimization solutions that are different from those obtained from standard flow-only simulation approaches Abstract: Numerical simulation of fluid flow, transport, and trapping mechanisms have been used to optimize CO2 storage in geologic formations by improving trapping efficiency through injection strategies. Flow models, however, do not capture the geomechanical deformation that can occur during CO2 injection, including reservoir expansion, ground surface uplift, and induced seismicity. The geomechanical risks of CO2 injection have drawn more attention in recent years and coupled flow and geomechanical simulation models are increasingly used to study the geomechanical effects during CO2 injection, to ensure environmentally sound and safe operations. We present an optimization framework for geologic CO2 storage under geomechanical risks, where coupled flow-geomechanics simulations are used to quantify the risks of injection-induced ground surface deformation and rock failure in reservoir and caprock layers. A multi-objective optimization problem is formulated and solved to maximize CO2 storage while minimizing the two forms of geomechanical risks. The optimization decision variables include the locations of injection wells. Multiple numerical experiments with increasing complexity are presented to demonstrate the performance of the proposed framework. The results reveal optimal decisions that are different from those obtained from flow-only simulation that disregard the geomechanical risks associated with CO2 injection. When geomechanical risks are considered, the wells may not necessarily be concentrated in areas with the highest storage capacity because that may lead to rock failure and/or unacceptable levels of ground surface uplift. Overall, the observations from this study reveal important differences in optimization results and conclusions when geomechanical risks of geologic CO2 storage are considered. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- International journal of greenhouse gas control. Volume 110(2021)
- Journal:
- International journal of greenhouse gas control
- Issue:
- Volume 110(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 110, Issue 2021 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 110
- Issue:
- 2021
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0110-2021-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2021-09
- Subjects:
- Geologic CO2 Storage -- Optimization -- Risk Assessment -- Coupled Flow and Geomechanics
Greenhouse gases -- Environmental aspects -- Periodicals
Air -- Purification -- Technological innovations -- Periodicals
Gaz à effet de serre -- Périodiques
Gaz à effet de serre -- Réduction -- Périodiques
Air -- Purification -- Technological innovations
Greenhouse gases -- Environmental aspects
Periodicals
363.73874605 - Journal URLs:
- http://rave.ohiolink.edu/ejournals/issn/17505836/ ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/17505836 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103385 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1750-5836
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4542.268600
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 18642.xml