The Comparison of Segmental Multifrequency Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis and Dual‐Energy X‐ray Absorptiometry for Estimating Fat Free Mass and Percentage Body Fat in an Ambulatory Population. Issue 6 (10th September 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hurt, Ryan T.; Ebbert, Jon O.; Croghan, Ivana; Nanda, Sanjeev; Schroeder, Darrell R.; Teigen, Levi M.; Velapati, Saketh R.; Mundi, Manpreet S.
• Is Part Of: JPEN, Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition. Volume 45:Issue 6(2021)
• Page Start: 1231
• Page End: 1238
• Publication Date: 2020-09-10
• Subjects: body composition -- bioelectrical impedance analysis -- dual‐energy x‐ray absorptiometry -- enteral nutrition -- Fat‐free mass -- percentage body fat; Parenteral feeding -- Periodicals; Enteral feeding -- Periodicals; 615.85484
• DOI: 10.1002/jpen.1994
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0148-6071

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Despite malnutrition being associated with increased mortality and morbidity, there continues to be great difficulty in defining criteria and implementing widespread screening. Tools used to diagnose decreased fat‐free mass (FFM [sarcopenia]) should be easy to use, relatively inexpensive, and safe. Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) has the potential to meet these criteria, but reliability across body mass index (BMI) classes is a concern. Methods: A total of 176 healthy ambulatory participants (aged 18–65 years) were recruited equally (n = 44) in 4 BMI categories: (1) 18.5–24.9, (2) 25.0–29.9, (3) 30–34.9, and (4) ≥35.0. Participants were fasting overnight and had S‐MFBIA (InBody 770) measurements the next morning, with DXA being performed subsequently within 30 minutes. Results: The measurement (mean ± SD) for FFM with DXA was 52.8 ± 11.0, and BIA was 53.6 ± 11.0. Delta (S‐MFBIA vs DXA) was 0.8 ± 2.2 (5% limits of agreement −3.5 to +5.2), and concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) was 0.98 (95% CI, 0.97–0.98). The measurements (mean ± SD) for PBF with DXA was 37.5 ± 10.6% and S‐MFBIA was 36.6 ± 11.3%. Delta (S‐MFBIA vs DXA) was −0.9 ± 2.6 (5% limits of agreement 6.0 to +4.2), and CCC was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.96–0.98). The CCC according to the 4 BMI groups for FFM and PBF was between 0.96–0.98 and 0.90–0.94, respectively. Conclusions: FFM and PBF measured by S‐MFBIA had good agreement with DXA across all BMI categories measured in the current study of ambulatory participants.