Acute sedation-associated complications in GI endoscopy (ProSed 2 Study): results from the prospective multicentre electronic registry of sedation-associated complications. Issue 3 (3rd January 2018)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Acute sedation-associated complications in GI endoscopy (ProSed 2 Study): results from the prospective multicentre electronic registry of sedation-associated complications. Issue 3 (3rd January 2018)
- Main Title:
- Acute sedation-associated complications in GI endoscopy (ProSed 2 Study): results from the prospective multicentre electronic registry of sedation-associated complications
- Authors:
- Behrens, Angelika
Kreuzmayr, Anton
Manner, Hendrik
Koop, Herbert
Lorenz, Albrecht
Schaefer, Claus
Plauth, Mathais
Jetschmann, Jens-Uwe
von Tirpitz, Christian
Ewald, Marcus
Sackmann, Michael
Renner, Wanja
Krüger, Martin
Schwab, Dieter
Hoffmann, Werner
Engelke, Olaf
Pech, Oliver
Kullmann, Frank
Pampuch, Sonja
Lenfers, Berthold
Weickert, Uwe
Schilling, Dieter
Boehm, Stephan
Beckebaum, Susanne
Cicinnati, Vito
Erckenbrecht, Joachim F
Dumoulin, Franz Ludwig
Benz, Claus
Rabenstein, Thomas
Haltern, Georg
Balsliemke, Martin
de Mas, Christian
Kleber, Gerhard
Pehl, Christian
Vogt, Christoph
Kiesslich, Ralf
Fischbach, Wolfgang
Koop, Irmtraut
Kuehne, Jens
Breidert, Matthias
Sass, Nils Lennart
May, Andrea
Friedrich, Christian
Veitt, Ronni
Porschen, Rainer
Ellrichmann, Mark
Arlt, Alexander
Schmitt, Wolfgang
Dollhopf, Markus
Schmidbaur, Werner
Dignass, Axel
Schmitz, Volker
Labenz, J
Kaiser, Gernot
Krannich, Alexander
Barteska, Nico
Ell, Christian
… (more) - Abstract:
- Abstract : Objectives: Sedation has been established for GI endoscopic procedures in most countries, but it is also associated with an added risk of complications. Reported complication rates are variable due to different study methodologies and often limited sample size. Designs: Acute sedation-associated complications were prospectively recorded in an electronic endoscopy documentation in 39 study centres between December 2011 and August 2014 (median inclusion period 24 months). The sedation regimen was decided by each study centre. Results: A total of 368 206 endoscopies was recorded; 11% without sedation. Propofol was the dominant drug used (62% only, 22.5% in combination with midazolam). Of the sedated patients, 38 (0.01%) suffered a major complication, and overall mortality was 0.005% (n=15); minor complications occurred in 0.3%. Multivariate analysis showed the following independent risk factors for all complications: American Society of Anesthesiologists class >2 (OR 2.29) and type and duration of endoscopy. Of the sedation regimens, propofol monosedation had the lowest rate (OR 0.75) compared with midazolam (reference) and combinations (OR 1.0–1.5). Compared with primary care hospitals, tertiary referral centres had higher complication rates (OR 1.61). Notably, compared with sedation by a two-person endoscopy team (endoscopist/assistant; 53.5% of all procedures), adding another person for sedation (nurse, physician) was associated with higher complication rates (ORsAbstract : Objectives: Sedation has been established for GI endoscopic procedures in most countries, but it is also associated with an added risk of complications. Reported complication rates are variable due to different study methodologies and often limited sample size. Designs: Acute sedation-associated complications were prospectively recorded in an electronic endoscopy documentation in 39 study centres between December 2011 and August 2014 (median inclusion period 24 months). The sedation regimen was decided by each study centre. Results: A total of 368 206 endoscopies was recorded; 11% without sedation. Propofol was the dominant drug used (62% only, 22.5% in combination with midazolam). Of the sedated patients, 38 (0.01%) suffered a major complication, and overall mortality was 0.005% (n=15); minor complications occurred in 0.3%. Multivariate analysis showed the following independent risk factors for all complications: American Society of Anesthesiologists class >2 (OR 2.29) and type and duration of endoscopy. Of the sedation regimens, propofol monosedation had the lowest rate (OR 0.75) compared with midazolam (reference) and combinations (OR 1.0–1.5). Compared with primary care hospitals, tertiary referral centres had higher complication rates (OR 1.61). Notably, compared with sedation by a two-person endoscopy team (endoscopist/assistant; 53.5% of all procedures), adding another person for sedation (nurse, physician) was associated with higher complication rates (ORs 1.40–4.46), probably due to higher complexity of procedures not evident in the multivariate analysis. Conclusions: This large multicentre registry study confirmed that severe acute sedation-related complications are rare during GI endoscopy with a very low mortality. The data are useful for planning risk factor-adapted sedation management to further prevent sedation-associated complications in selected patients. Trial registration number: DRKS00007768; Pre-results. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Gut. Volume 68:Issue 3(2019)
- Journal:
- Gut
- Issue:
- Volume 68:Issue 3(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 68, Issue 3 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 68
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0068-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- 445
- Page End:
- 452
- Publication Date:
- 2018-01-03
- Subjects:
- cardiovascular complications -- gastrointesinal endoscopy
Gastroenterology -- Periodicals
616.33 - Journal URLs:
- http://gut.bmjjournals.com ↗
http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-311037 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0017-5749
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 18621.xml