Choosing the path of austerity: how parties and policy coalitions influence welfare state retrenchment in periods of fiscal consolidation. Issue 4 (3rd July 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Armingeon, Klaus; Guthmann, Kai; Weisstanner, David
• Is Part Of: West European politics. Volume 39:Issue 4(2016)
• Page Start: 628
• Page End: 647
• Publication Date: 2016-07-03
• Subjects: Austerity -- comparative political economy -- welfare state retrenchment -- institutions; Europe -- Politics and government -- 1945- -- Periodicals; 320.94
• DOI: 10.1080/01402382.2015.1111072
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0140-2382

Abstract

Abstract: What are the conditions under which some austerity programmes rely on substantial cuts to social spending? More specifically, do the partisan complexion and the type of government condition the extent to which austerity policies imply welfare state retrenchment? This article demonstrates that large budget consolidations tend to be associated with welfare state retrenchment. The findings support a partisan and a politico-institutionalist argument: (i) in periods of fiscal consolidation, welfare state retrenchment tends to be more pronounced under left-wing governments; (ii) since welfare state retrenchment is electorally and politically risky, it also tends to be more pronounced when pursued by a broad pro-reform coalition government. Therefore, the article shows that during budget consolidations implemented by left-wing broad coalition governments, welfare state retrenchment is greatest. Using long-run multipliers from autoregressive distributed lag models on 17 OECD countries during the 1982–2009 period, substantial support is found for these expectations.