PWE-108 The flexible sigmoidoscopy dops assessment tool: evidence of validity and competency development during training. (June 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- PWE-108 The flexible sigmoidoscopy dops assessment tool: evidence of validity and competency development during training. (June 2019)
- Main Title:
- PWE-108 The flexible sigmoidoscopy dops assessment tool: evidence of validity and competency development during training
- Authors:
- Siau, Keith
Crossley, Prof James
Dunckley, Paul
Johnson, Gavin
Haycock, Adam
Anderson, John
Iacucci, Marietta
Feeney, Mark - Abstract:
- Abstract : Introduction: Data supporting milestone development during flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) training are lacking. We aimed to present validity evidence for our formative direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS) assessment in FS, and use DOPS to establish competency benchmarks and define learning curves for a national training cohort. Methods: This prospective UK-wide (211 centres) study included all FS formative DOPS assessments submitted to the national e-portfolio. Reliability was estimated from generalisability theory analysis. Item and global DOPS scores were correlated with lifetime procedure count to study learning curves, with competency benchmarks defined using contrasting groups analysis. Multivariable binary logistic regression was performed to identify independent predictors of DOPS competence. Results: 3616 DOPS submitted for 468 trainees were included for analysis. From generalisability analysis, sources of overall competency score variance included: trainee ability (27%), assessor stringency (15%), assessor subjectivity attributable to the trainee (18%) and case-to-case variation (40%), which enabled the modelling of reliability estimates. The competency benchmark (mean DOPS score: 3.84) was achieved after 15–74 procedures. Across the cohort, competency development occurred in the order of: pre-procedural (5–4), non-technical (7–49), technical (12–74) and post-procedural (17–99) skills (Abstract PWE-108 Figure 1). Lifetime procedural countAbstract : Introduction: Data supporting milestone development during flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) training are lacking. We aimed to present validity evidence for our formative direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS) assessment in FS, and use DOPS to establish competency benchmarks and define learning curves for a national training cohort. Methods: This prospective UK-wide (211 centres) study included all FS formative DOPS assessments submitted to the national e-portfolio. Reliability was estimated from generalisability theory analysis. Item and global DOPS scores were correlated with lifetime procedure count to study learning curves, with competency benchmarks defined using contrasting groups analysis. Multivariable binary logistic regression was performed to identify independent predictors of DOPS competence. Results: 3616 DOPS submitted for 468 trainees were included for analysis. From generalisability analysis, sources of overall competency score variance included: trainee ability (27%), assessor stringency (15%), assessor subjectivity attributable to the trainee (18%) and case-to-case variation (40%), which enabled the modelling of reliability estimates. The competency benchmark (mean DOPS score: 3.84) was achieved after 15–74 procedures. Across the cohort, competency development occurred in the order of: pre-procedural (5–4), non-technical (7–49), technical (12–74) and post-procedural (17–99) skills (Abstract PWE-108 Figure 1). Lifetime procedural count (P<0.001), case difficulty (P<0.001), and lifetime formative DOPS count (P=0.001) were independently associated with DOPS competence, but not trainee or assessor specialty. Conclusion: Sigmoidoscopy DOPS can provide valid and reliable assessments of competency during training and can be used to chart competency development. Contrary to earlier studies based on destination-orientated endpoints, overall competency in sigmoidoscopy was attained after 150 lifetime procedures. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Gut. Volume 68(2019)Supplement 2
- Journal:
- Gut
- Issue:
- Volume 68(2019)Supplement 2
- Issue Display:
- Volume 68, Issue 2 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 68
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0068-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- A252
- Page End:
- A253
- Publication Date:
- 2019-06
- Subjects:
- Gastroenterology -- Periodicals
616.33 - Journal URLs:
- http://gut.bmjjournals.com ↗
http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-BSGAbstracts.479 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0017-5749
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 18573.xml