TM3-10 National survey and experimental evaluation of commonly used external ventricular drain (EVD) securement methods in a porcine model; recommendations to improve practise. Issue 3 (14th February 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- TM3-10 National survey and experimental evaluation of commonly used external ventricular drain (EVD) securement methods in a porcine model; recommendations to improve practise. Issue 3 (14th February 2019)
- Main Title:
- TM3-10 National survey and experimental evaluation of commonly used external ventricular drain (EVD) securement methods in a porcine model; recommendations to improve practise
- Authors:
- Akarca, D
Durnford, A
Ewbank, F
Hempenstall, J
Sadek, A
Gould, A
Bulters, D - Abstract:
- Abstract : Objectives: External ventricular drain (EVD) dislodgement is common and can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. UK trial data suggests dislodgement as high as 12%. This study aimed to establish the range of methods used nationally and determine the most secure method in a porcine model. Design: Survey and experimental study. Subjects: 23 neurosurgical units surveyed. Porcine cadaver experimental model. Methods: Survey distribution was made through the British Neurosurgical Trainee Research Collaborative. 15 securement methods were tested on the porcine model and peak pull-out force before EVD failure was measured. Failure was defined as catheter displacement 1 cm from the insertion site, catheter fracture or suture fracture. Results: Nationally, five EVD securement methods were in common use. There were considerable differences in peak pull-out force between methods. The most secure methods were a construct consisting of anchoring suture, further multiple sutures around a coil of catheter followed by either a soft (25.85N, 95% CI 24.95 N-26.75N) or hard plastic flange (29.05N, 95% CI 25.69 N-32.41N). Individually, anchoring sutures, soft flanges, VentriFix and staples were least secure, whilst multiple sutures and hard flanges were most secure. Conclusions: An anchoring suture followed by a coil of catheter and a flange is the most secure method for securing EVDs, withstanding up to 8.2 times the force of a single anchoring suture. It is easily employedAbstract : Objectives: External ventricular drain (EVD) dislodgement is common and can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. UK trial data suggests dislodgement as high as 12%. This study aimed to establish the range of methods used nationally and determine the most secure method in a porcine model. Design: Survey and experimental study. Subjects: 23 neurosurgical units surveyed. Porcine cadaver experimental model. Methods: Survey distribution was made through the British Neurosurgical Trainee Research Collaborative. 15 securement methods were tested on the porcine model and peak pull-out force before EVD failure was measured. Failure was defined as catheter displacement 1 cm from the insertion site, catheter fracture or suture fracture. Results: Nationally, five EVD securement methods were in common use. There were considerable differences in peak pull-out force between methods. The most secure methods were a construct consisting of anchoring suture, further multiple sutures around a coil of catheter followed by either a soft (25.85N, 95% CI 24.95 N-26.75N) or hard plastic flange (29.05N, 95% CI 25.69 N-32.41N). Individually, anchoring sutures, soft flanges, VentriFix and staples were least secure, whilst multiple sutures and hard flanges were most secure. Conclusions: An anchoring suture followed by a coil of catheter and a flange is the most secure method for securing EVDs, withstanding up to 8.2 times the force of a single anchoring suture. It is easily employed and may decrease the likelihood of EVD dislodgement and associated complications. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry. Volume 90:Issue 3(2019)
- Journal:
- Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry
- Issue:
- Volume 90:Issue 3(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 90, Issue 3 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 90
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0090-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- e17
- Page End:
- e16
- Publication Date:
- 2019-02-14
- Subjects:
- Neurology -- Periodicals
Nervous system -- Surgery -- Periodicals
Psychiatry -- Periodicals
616.8 - Journal URLs:
- http://jnnp.bmjjournals.com/ ↗
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/tocrender.fcgi?action=archive&journal=192 ↗
http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/jnnp-2019-ABN.55 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0022-3050
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 18582.xml