PTU-152 Pepsin In Saliva For The Diagnosis Of Gastro-esophageal Reflux Disease. (9th June 2014)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- PTU-152 Pepsin In Saliva For The Diagnosis Of Gastro-esophageal Reflux Disease. (9th June 2014)
- Main Title:
- PTU-152 Pepsin In Saliva For The Diagnosis Of Gastro-esophageal Reflux Disease
- Authors:
- Hayat, JO
Gabieta-Somnez, S
Yazaki, E
Kang, J-Y
Woodcock, A
Dettmar, P
Mabary, J
Knowles, C
Sifrim, D - Abstract:
- Abstract : Introduction: Current diagnostic tests for GORD have moderate sensitivity/specificity and can be invasive and expensive. Pepsin detection in saliva has been proposed as an "office-based" method for GORD diagnosis. The aims of this study were to establish normal values of salivary pepsin in a large cohort of healthy asymptomatic subjects and to determine its value to discriminate patients with reflux-related symptoms (GORD, hypersensitive oesophagus) from functional heartburn. Methods: 100 asymptomatic controls and 111 patients with heartburn underwent MII-pH monitoring and simultaneous salivary pepsin determination on waking, after lunch and dinner. Cut off value for pepsin positivity was 16 ng/ml. Patients were divided into GORD (increased acid exposure time (AET) n = 58); Hypersensitive Oesophagus (HO) (normal AET and + SAP), n = 26) and Functional Heartburn (FH) (normal AET and – SAP, n = 27). Multiple group comparisons were performed using one-way ANOVA followed by with Tukey's Test for Gaussian distributed data and the Kruskall-Wallis Test with Dunns comparison for non-Gaussian data. Receiver Operator Characteristic curves were constructed to determine and compare the sensitivity and specificity of different pepsin cut-off concentrations. Results: 1/3 of asymptomatic subjects had pepsin in saliva at low concentration (0(0–59) ng/ml). Patients with reflux-related symptoms (GORD and HO) had higher prevalence (77–89%) and pepsin concentration than controls (HO,Abstract : Introduction: Current diagnostic tests for GORD have moderate sensitivity/specificity and can be invasive and expensive. Pepsin detection in saliva has been proposed as an "office-based" method for GORD diagnosis. The aims of this study were to establish normal values of salivary pepsin in a large cohort of healthy asymptomatic subjects and to determine its value to discriminate patients with reflux-related symptoms (GORD, hypersensitive oesophagus) from functional heartburn. Methods: 100 asymptomatic controls and 111 patients with heartburn underwent MII-pH monitoring and simultaneous salivary pepsin determination on waking, after lunch and dinner. Cut off value for pepsin positivity was 16 ng/ml. Patients were divided into GORD (increased acid exposure time (AET) n = 58); Hypersensitive Oesophagus (HO) (normal AET and + SAP), n = 26) and Functional Heartburn (FH) (normal AET and – SAP, n = 27). Multiple group comparisons were performed using one-way ANOVA followed by with Tukey's Test for Gaussian distributed data and the Kruskall-Wallis Test with Dunns comparison for non-Gaussian data. Receiver Operator Characteristic curves were constructed to determine and compare the sensitivity and specificity of different pepsin cut-off concentrations. Results: 1/3 of asymptomatic subjects had pepsin in saliva at low concentration (0(0–59) ng/ml). Patients with reflux-related symptoms (GORD and HO) had higher prevalence (77–89%) and pepsin concentration than controls (HO, 237(52–311) ng/ml and GORD, 121(29–252) ng/ml) (p < 0.05). Patients with FH had low prevalence (33%) and concentration of pepsin in saliva (0(0–40) ng/ml). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve had a value of 0.8034 +/-0.04 (95% confidence interval 0.719 to 0.8873, p < 0.0001). A positive test had 77.6% sensitivity and 63.2% specificity for diagnosis of GORD/HO. When all saliva samples were negative, there was 80% probability that symptoms were not due to reflux (FH). One positive sample with >210 ng/ml pepsin suggested the presence of GORD/HO with 95% probability. Conclusion: In patients with symptoms suggestive of GORD, salivary pepsin can be used to confirm or reject the diagnosis before empirical PPI treatment. This may lessen the use of unnecessary anti-reflux therapy and the need for further invasive and expensive diagnostic methods. Disclosure of Interest: J. Hayat: None Declared, S. Gabieta-Somnez: None Declared, E. Yazaki: None Declared, J.-Y. Kang: None Declared, A. Woodcock Employee of: RD Biomed Ltd, P. Dettmar Employee of: RD Biomed Ltd, J. Mabary Employee of: Sandhill Sci., C. Knowles: None Declared, D. Sifrim Grant/research support from: Sandhill Sci. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Gut. Volume 63(2014)Supplement 1
- Journal:
- Gut
- Issue:
- Volume 63(2014)Supplement 1
- Issue Display:
- Volume 63, Issue 1 (2014)
- Year:
- 2014
- Volume:
- 63
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2014-0063-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- A105
- Page End:
- A105
- Publication Date:
- 2014-06-09
- Subjects:
- Gastroenterology -- Periodicals
616.33 - Journal URLs:
- http://gut.bmjjournals.com ↗
http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307263.226 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0017-5749
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 18577.xml