PWE-166 Is Response To Linaclotide After 4 Weeks Of Treatment Predictive Of 12-week Improvement?. (9th June 2014)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- PWE-166 Is Response To Linaclotide After 4 Weeks Of Treatment Predictive Of 12-week Improvement?. (9th June 2014)
- Main Title:
- PWE-166 Is Response To Linaclotide After 4 Weeks Of Treatment Predictive Of 12-week Improvement?
- Authors:
- Chey, W
Lavins, B
Shiff, S
MacDougall, J
Kurtz, C
Currie, M
Johnston, J - Abstract:
- Abstract : Introduction: Linaclotide is a minimally absorbed guanylate cyclase C agonist approved in the US and EU for irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C). A question for prescribing physicians is whether to continue linaclotide in patients who do not improve during the early weeks of therapy. This post-hoc analysis assessed if response to linaclotide at Week 4 predicts Week 12 improvement, and if linaclotide should be continued in IBS-C patients not responding by Week 4. Methods: Pooled data from 2 Phase 3 IBS-C trials of linaclotide were analysed. For Degree of Relief of IBS Symptoms, Degree of Relief of Abdominal Pain, and Spontaneous Bowel Movement [SBM] frequency, a patient's Week-4 clinical response was used to predict improvement at Week 12. For the purposes of determining a patient's Week-4 response, the 7-point balanced Degree of Relief scale was collapsed into 3 categories: Improved (completely, considerably, or somewhat relieved), Unchanged, and Worse (somewhat worse, considerably worse, or as bad as I can imagine) compared with baseline. For SBM frequency, a dichotomous end point was used: SBMs increased by ≥2/week or not increased by ≥2/week from baseline. Results: The proportion of patients who had response at Week 4 was significantly greater for linaclotide- vs placebo-treated patients: 72 vs. 47% for Degree of Relief of IBS Symptoms, 70 vs. 47% for Degree of Relief of Abdominal Pain, and 59% vs 33% for SBM frequency (all comparisons: p <Abstract : Introduction: Linaclotide is a minimally absorbed guanylate cyclase C agonist approved in the US and EU for irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C). A question for prescribing physicians is whether to continue linaclotide in patients who do not improve during the early weeks of therapy. This post-hoc analysis assessed if response to linaclotide at Week 4 predicts Week 12 improvement, and if linaclotide should be continued in IBS-C patients not responding by Week 4. Methods: Pooled data from 2 Phase 3 IBS-C trials of linaclotide were analysed. For Degree of Relief of IBS Symptoms, Degree of Relief of Abdominal Pain, and Spontaneous Bowel Movement [SBM] frequency, a patient's Week-4 clinical response was used to predict improvement at Week 12. For the purposes of determining a patient's Week-4 response, the 7-point balanced Degree of Relief scale was collapsed into 3 categories: Improved (completely, considerably, or somewhat relieved), Unchanged, and Worse (somewhat worse, considerably worse, or as bad as I can imagine) compared with baseline. For SBM frequency, a dichotomous end point was used: SBMs increased by ≥2/week or not increased by ≥2/week from baseline. Results: The proportion of patients who had response at Week 4 was significantly greater for linaclotide- vs placebo-treated patients: 72 vs. 47% for Degree of Relief of IBS Symptoms, 70 vs. 47% for Degree of Relief of Abdominal Pain, and 59% vs 33% for SBM frequency (all comparisons: p < 0.0001). For all parameters, most linaclotide-treated patients (≥70%) who had response at Week 4 were improved at Week 12. For linaclotide-treated patients whose symptoms were unchanged at Week 4 for Degree of Relief of IBS Symptoms and Degree of Relief of Abdominal Pain, 36 and 39% were improved at Week 12, vs. 19 and 21% of the placebo group, respectively (p < 0.05). For SBM frequency, 30% of linaclotide-treated patients vs. 17% of placebo-treated patients without response at Week 4 were improved (SBMs ≥2) at Week 12 (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Patients whose IBS symptoms improved after 4 weeks with linaclotide were likely to maintain improvement. At least 30% of linaclotide patients who were unchanged at Week 4 experienced symptom improvement by Week 12. The significant differences between linaclotide and placebo in the percentage of patients improved at Week 12 who were unchanged at Week 4 indicates that in some patients ≥1 month of linaclotide therapy may be required for improvement. Hence, an initial course of linaclotide therapy in patients with IBS-C shou.ld be >4 weeks. Study funded by Forest Laboratories, Inc., and Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Disclosure of Interest: W. Chey Consultant for: Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Forest Research Institute, B. Lavins Shareholder of: Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Employee of: Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, S. Shiff Shareholder of: Forest Research Institute, Employee of: Forest Research Institute, J. MacDougall Shareholder of: Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Employee of: Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, C. Kurtz Shareholder of: Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Employee of: Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, M. Currie Shareholder of: Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Employee of: Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, J. Johnston Shareholder of: Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Employee of: Ironwood Pharmaceuticals. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Gut. Volume 63(2014)Supplement 1
- Journal:
- Gut
- Issue:
- Volume 63(2014)Supplement 1
- Issue Display:
- Volume 63, Issue 1 (2014)
- Year:
- 2014
- Volume:
- 63
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2014-0063-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- A197
- Page End:
- A198
- Publication Date:
- 2014-06-09
- Subjects:
- Gastroenterology -- Periodicals
616.33 - Journal URLs:
- http://gut.bmjjournals.com ↗
http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307263.426 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0017-5749
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 18576.xml