PWE-024 Clinical And Economic Burden Associated With Anastomotic Leak After Colorectal Surgeries In The United Kingdom. (9th June 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wan, Y; Lim, S; Riebman, J; Jamous, N; Gao, X
• Is Part Of: Gut. Volume 63(2014)Supplement 1
• Page Start: A132
• Page End: A132
• Publication Date: 2014-06-09
• Subjects: Gastroenterology -- Periodicals; 616.33
• DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307263.284
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0017-5749

Abstract

Abstract : Introduction: In the UK, anastomotic leak rate after colorectal surgeries has been reported up to 19%. Yet, clinical and economic consequences of anastomotic leak have not been clearly articulated. Our study aims to estimate the clinical/economic burden of anastomotic leak following colorectal surgeries in the UK. Methods: The Hospital Episode Statistics database was used to identify English National Health Service Trust adult patients undergoing colorectal surgeries between January 2007 and December 2011. Anastomotic leak was identified by re-intervention/diagnosis codes within a 30-day window following colorectal surgery, including re-operation, re-anastomosis, stent, colostomy, image guided drainage, washout procedure, abscess/drainage and diagnosis of generalised (acute) peritonitis. Hospital costs were calculated using Healthcare Resource Group and Department of Health reference index costs. Differences in outcomes between groups were compared using a propensity score matching approach, adjusting for age, gender, admission method, surgery type, comorbidity and medical stabilisation. Generalised linear models (GLM) were performed to estimate the impact of leak on costs/LOS, adjusting for covariates. Results: A total of 131, 689 patients received colorectal surgeries (mean age: 65.2 ± 15.4, male: 50.4%). The rate of anastomotic leak following colorectal surgery was 6.4% (8, 404 out of 131, 689). After propensity score matching by key covariates, Patients with leak (vs. without leak) had higher in-hospital mortality (15.9% (95% CI: 15.2%, 16.7%) vs. 6.2% (95% CI: 5.7%, 6.7%), p < 0.001), 30-day readmission rate (19.7% vs. 11.6%, p < 0.001), and post-operative infection rate (19.3% vs. 4.5%, p < 0.001). The hospitalisations for patients with leak (vs. without leak) were more costly (£9, 071 ± £4, 588 vs. £6, 420 ± £2, 895, p < 0.001) and longer (20 ± 23 vs. 11 ± 13 days, p < 0.001). Anastomotic leak resulted in an additional cost of £2651 and an extra LOS of 9 days per patient. GLM analyses revealed comparable results. Conclusion: Our study findings underscore the clinical/economic burden of anastomotic leak after colorectal surgeries in the UK. The presence of anastomotic leak was associated with greater mortality, LOS, and costs, highlighting the importance of providing prompt medical attention to minimise the impact of anastomotic leak. Disclosure of Interest: Y. Wan Consultant for: Yin Wan is an employee of Pharmerit International. Pharmerit International were paid by Ethicon Inc. in connexion with this study., S. Lim Employee of: S Lim is an employee of Ethicon, Inc., J. Riebman Employee of: J Riebman is an employee of Ethicon, Inc., N. Jamous Employee of: N Jamous is an employee of Ethicon, Inc., X. Gao Consultant for: X Gao is an employee of Pharmerit International. Pharmerit International were paid by Ethicon Inc. in connexion with this study.