Geometrical characteristics of the symptomatic and non-symptomatic ossa trigona. Issue 6 (August 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Zwiers, Ruben; Görgec, Burak; van Dijk, C. Niek; Blankevoort, Leendert
• Is Part Of: Foot and ankle surgery. Volume 27:Issue 6(2021)
• Page Start: 650
• Page End: 654
• Publication Date: 2021-08
• Subjects: Ankle -- Impingement -- os trigonum; Foot -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Ankle -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Ankle -- surgery -- Periodicals; Foot -- surgery -- Periodicals; Ankle -- Surgery; Foot -- Surgery; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 617.58
• DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2020.08.006
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1268-7731

Abstract

Highlights: In patients with bilateral ossa trigona, there are large differences in size and shape. We found symptomatic ossa trigona to be larger in comparison with the asymptomatic contralateral side. Calcifications were seen more often around symptomatic ossa trigona. No differences in distance between ossa trigona and surrounding bones were found between symptomatic and asymptomatic side. Abstract: Background: Posterior ankle impingement is strongly associated with the presence of an os trigonum, however, most patients with an os trigonum will never develop symptoms. It is hypothesized that the os trigonum is larger in the symptomatic ankle than in the non-symptomatic ankle, the distance between os trigonum and tibia is smaller and there are more degenerative changes in ankles with symptoms of posterior impingement. In this study the geometrical characteristics of the ipsilateral and contralateral os trigonum are compared in patients with a bilateral os trigonum and unilateral posterior impingement symptoms. Methods: Patients with a bilateral os trigonum and unilateral posterior impingement complaints were included. Comparison between the symptomatic and asymptomatic ankles was done within each patient. From the CT-scan of each ankle, the tibia, fibula, calcaneus, talus and os trigonum were segmented and a geometric model was created. Based on these bone models, the volume of the os trigonum and talus, the size of the os trigonum, the distance between os trigonum and surrounding bones (talus, calcaneus, fibula and tibia) were calculated. In addition, the CT images were assessed for the type of os trigonum, the presence of cysts, irregular synchondrosis, calcifications and whether the os trigonum consisted of more than one fragment. Results: A total of 22 patients were included in this study. In seventeen of the 22 patients, the symptomatic os trigonum was larger in comparison with the non-symptomatic side in terms of length (median Δ 2.4 mm, 8.9 versus 10.6 mm) and relative volume (median Δ 0.09%, 0.30 versus 0.45% of talar volume). Distances between the ossa trigona and surrounding bones were not statistically significantly different between both sides. Calcifications were more frequently found around the os trigonum in the symptomatic side (10 versus 3/22). Conclusions: The findings in this study support the hypothesis that symptomatic ossa trigona are larger in comparison with asymptomatic ossa trigona. Calcifications around the os trigonum were found more frequently in symptomatic than in non-symptomatic ossa trigona. Level of Evidence: III.