PWE-194 Randomised study of RIGJ vs PEGJ in Patients at Risk of Aspiration Pneumonia. (4th June 2013)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- PWE-194 Randomised study of RIGJ vs PEGJ in Patients at Risk of Aspiration Pneumonia. (4th June 2013)
- Main Title:
- PWE-194 Randomised study of RIGJ vs PEGJ in Patients at Risk of Aspiration Pneumonia
- Authors:
- Lewis, S
Latchford, A
Gruning, T - Abstract:
- Abstract : Introduction: In patients at risk of aspiration pneumonia due to gastro-oesophageal reflux who require gastrojejunostomy feeding tubes, the tubes are placed either radiologically (RIGJ) or endoscopicaly (PEGJ). There is little published evidence to inform which is superior. Methods: Consecutive patients referred for long-term jejunal feeding because of high risk of aspiration pneumonia (proven GORD or pneumonia whilst being NG fed) were randomly allocated to have a RIGJ or PEGJ inserted. A Tc99m colloid study was done to determine the presence of gastro-oesophageal reflux and jejunal gastric reflux after feeding tube placement. We recorded pneumonia, death, feeding tube displacement, blockage and replacement to 90 days post placement. Results: 65 patients were randomised, 31 RIGJ and 34 PEGJ. Baseline characteristics including Barthell index were similar between groups. GORD was demonstrated by Tc99m tracer injected intragastrically in 52% but in no patient when injected jejunally. Jejunal feeding tube and clinical complications (number). Conclusion: There was little difference in clinical outcomes between RIGJ vs PEGJ tubes for feeding patients at high risk of pneumonia. However, RIGJ tubes were considerably less prone to blockage and displacement than PEGJ tubes. Tube blockage was a major cause of frustration for patients and resource use for health care services. Replacing enteral tubes in frail patients was distressing and a significant use of health careAbstract : Introduction: In patients at risk of aspiration pneumonia due to gastro-oesophageal reflux who require gastrojejunostomy feeding tubes, the tubes are placed either radiologically (RIGJ) or endoscopicaly (PEGJ). There is little published evidence to inform which is superior. Methods: Consecutive patients referred for long-term jejunal feeding because of high risk of aspiration pneumonia (proven GORD or pneumonia whilst being NG fed) were randomly allocated to have a RIGJ or PEGJ inserted. A Tc99m colloid study was done to determine the presence of gastro-oesophageal reflux and jejunal gastric reflux after feeding tube placement. We recorded pneumonia, death, feeding tube displacement, blockage and replacement to 90 days post placement. Results: 65 patients were randomised, 31 RIGJ and 34 PEGJ. Baseline characteristics including Barthell index were similar between groups. GORD was demonstrated by Tc99m tracer injected intragastrically in 52% but in no patient when injected jejunally. Jejunal feeding tube and clinical complications (number). Conclusion: There was little difference in clinical outcomes between RIGJ vs PEGJ tubes for feeding patients at high risk of pneumonia. However, RIGJ tubes were considerably less prone to blockage and displacement than PEGJ tubes. Tube blockage was a major cause of frustration for patients and resource use for health care services. Replacing enteral tubes in frail patients was distressing and a significant use of health care resource. Consideration should be given to placing RIGJ in preference to PEGJ tubes. Disclosure of Interest: None Declared. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Gut. Volume 62(2013)Supplement 1
- Journal:
- Gut
- Issue:
- Volume 62(2013)Supplement 1
- Issue Display:
- Volume 62, Issue 1 (2013)
- Year:
- 2013
- Volume:
- 62
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2013-0062-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- A209
- Page End:
- A209
- Publication Date:
- 2013-06-04
- Subjects:
- Gastroenterology -- Periodicals
616.33 - Journal URLs:
- http://gut.bmjjournals.com ↗
http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-304907.482 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0017-5749
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 18580.xml