PWE-090 Management and short term outcomes of malignant colorectal polyps in the North of England. (28th May 2012)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- PWE-090 Management and short term outcomes of malignant colorectal polyps in the North of England. (28th May 2012)
- Main Title:
- PWE-090 Management and short term outcomes of malignant colorectal polyps in the North of England
- Authors:
- Gill, M D
Rutter, M D
Holtham, S J - Abstract:
- Abstract : Introduction: Management of malignant colorectal polyps (MCPs) is contentious with no randomised controlled trials comparing endoscopic with surgical management. This study reviews the management and outcomes of MCPs across a UK region. Methods: Patients were identified using the NORCCAG (NORthern Colorectal Cancer Audit Group) database between April 2006 and July 2010. All histopathology reports and follow-up procedures were reviewed. Results: Of 386 patients identified, 165 (42.7%) had the polyp biopsied, 37 (9.6%) a piecemeal excision, 184 (47.7%) a polypectomy. All initial biopsies underwent surgical intervention. 103/221 initial local excisions (46.6%) had follow-up surgery of whom 79 (76.7%) had no residual cancer. Of the 118 managed endoscopically, none had residual cancer on follow-up endoscopy. The 21 (5.4%) Dukes' C cancers were significantly associated with Kikuchi SM3/Haggitt 4 lesions (χ 2 =10.85, p=0.005) and lesions with an involved/unsure excision margin (χ 2 =7.44, p=0.017). Positive predictors of finding residual tumour at surgery were Kikuchi SM3/Haggitt Level 4 (χ 2 =17.07, p<0.001), and any involved/unsure excision margin (χ 2 =20.45, p<0.001). An excision margin >0 mm was significantly associated with finding no residual tumour (χ 2 =25.21, p<0.001). There was no difference in survival between surgical and endoscopic management (χ 2 =0.634, p=0.426). Conclusion: Endoscopic management of a subgroup of MCPs appears safe and effective. A clearAbstract : Introduction: Management of malignant colorectal polyps (MCPs) is contentious with no randomised controlled trials comparing endoscopic with surgical management. This study reviews the management and outcomes of MCPs across a UK region. Methods: Patients were identified using the NORCCAG (NORthern Colorectal Cancer Audit Group) database between April 2006 and July 2010. All histopathology reports and follow-up procedures were reviewed. Results: Of 386 patients identified, 165 (42.7%) had the polyp biopsied, 37 (9.6%) a piecemeal excision, 184 (47.7%) a polypectomy. All initial biopsies underwent surgical intervention. 103/221 initial local excisions (46.6%) had follow-up surgery of whom 79 (76.7%) had no residual cancer. Of the 118 managed endoscopically, none had residual cancer on follow-up endoscopy. The 21 (5.4%) Dukes' C cancers were significantly associated with Kikuchi SM3/Haggitt 4 lesions (χ 2 =10.85, p=0.005) and lesions with an involved/unsure excision margin (χ 2 =7.44, p=0.017). Positive predictors of finding residual tumour at surgery were Kikuchi SM3/Haggitt Level 4 (χ 2 =17.07, p<0.001), and any involved/unsure excision margin (χ 2 =20.45, p<0.001). An excision margin >0 mm was significantly associated with finding no residual tumour (χ 2 =25.21, p<0.001). There was no difference in survival between surgical and endoscopic management (χ 2 =0.634, p=0.426). Conclusion: Endoscopic management of a subgroup of MCPs appears safe and effective. A clear resection margin (>0 mm) appears sufficient to avoid surgery. Advanced lesions (Kikuchi 3/Haggitt 4) have a greater risk of residual cancer at surgery, and of lymph node metastases. Competing interests: None declared. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Gut. Volume 61(2012)Supplement 2
- Journal:
- Gut
- Issue:
- Volume 61(2012)Supplement 2
- Issue Display:
- Volume 61, Issue 2 (2012)
- Year:
- 2012
- Volume:
- 61
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2012-0061-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- A334
- Page End:
- A334
- Publication Date:
- 2012-05-28
- Subjects:
- Gastroenterology -- Periodicals
616.33 - Journal URLs:
- http://gut.bmjjournals.com ↗
http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302514d.90 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0017-5749
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 18596.xml