${LFIs}$ and methods of classical recapture. (27th November 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Tajer, Diego
• Is Part Of: Logic journal of the IGPL. Volume 28:Number 5(2020)
• Page Start: 807
• Page End: 816
• Publication Date: 2018-11-27
• Subjects: Paraconsistency -- LFIs -- classical recapture -- shrieking -- adaptative logics; Logic, Symbolic and mathematical -- Periodicals; 511.3
• DOI: 10.1093/jigpal/jzy060
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1367-0751

Abstract

Abstract: In this paper, I will argue that Logics of Formal Inconsistency $(LFIs)$ can be used as very sophisticated and powerful methods of classical recapture. I will compare $LFIs$ with the well-known non-monotonic logics by Batens (2001, Log. Anal., 45–68) and Priest (2006, In Contradiction, Oxford University) and the 'shrieking' rules of Beall (2013, Rev. Symb. Log., 6, 755–764). I will show that these proposals can be represented in $LFIs$ and that $LFIs$ give room to more complex and varied recapturing strategies.