011 QT PEAK DISPERSION CORRELATED WITH LV SIZE AND MASS IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC HEART FAILURE, BUT NOT TO THE AMOUNT OF SCAR PRESENT. (24th May 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Khaleva, O; Sherwi, N; Lukaschuk, E; Borovickova, M; Khan, Z H; Lee, V; Joshi, A; Loh, H; Bourantas, C; Clark, A L; Cleland, J G F; Wong, K
• Is Part Of: Heart. Volume 99(2013)Supplement 2
• Page Start: A12
• Page End: A12
• Publication Date: 2013-05-24
• Subjects: Heart -- Diseases -- Treatment -- Periodicals; Cardiology -- Periodicals; 616.12
• DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2013-304019.11
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1355-6037

Abstract

Abstract : Introduction: In middle aged men with a normal QT interval on a resting 12-lead ECG, increased QT peak dispersion is an independent risk factor for sudden cardiac death. QT peak prolongation is associated with left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy in hypertensive subjects, stroke survivors, and patients with suspected coronary artery disease. However, young footballers with LVH characterised by myocyte hypertrophy (with no fibrosis) do not have QT peak prolongation. We wondered if increased left ventricular mass and scar burden were associated with QT peak dispersion in patients with heart failure (HF). Methods: 121 consecutive patients with chronic heart failure in sinus rhythm were studied. LV mass was determined on cardiac MRI. Scar mass was assessed using late gadolinium enhancement. The ECGs were analysed by a single observer who was blind to the results of the cardiac MRI and to clinical findings. QT peak (QTp) was measured from onset of the Q-wave to the peak of T-wave in every ECG lead of the 12-lead ECG, and heart rate corrected (QTpc) using Bazett's formula. QTpc dispersion was defined as QTpc Max—QTpc Min. Results are presented as mean±SD, unless stated otherwise. Results: 121 patients (17 female) were aged 66±10.9 years. LV ejection fraction was (EF) 36±11%, end-diastolic volume (EDV) 239±72 ml, end-systolic volume (ESV) 159±67 ml, LV mass 146±30.9 g, scar mass was 27±10 g and formed 19±7% of the LV mass. The QTpc dispersion was 76±40 ms. QTpc dispersion correlated with total LV mass (r=0.3, p=0.01) and size (EDV r=0.4, p=0.002; ESV 0.4, p=0.001). There was no correlation between QTpc dispersion and scar size, either expressed in absolute units or as a percentage of total LV mass. Conclusions: QTpc dispersion correlated with the total LV mass and LV size. However, there was no correlation between QTpc dispersion and scar size as determined by cardiac MR with late gadolinium enhancement imaging.