Bone regeneration in both small and large preclinical bone defect models using an injectable polymer‐based substitute containing hydroxyapatite and reconstituted with saline or autologous blood. Issue 10 (2nd April 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Maurel, Delphine B; Fénelon, Mathilde; Aid‐Launais, Rachida; Bidault, Laurent; Le Nir, Alice; Renard, Martine; Fricain, Jean‐Christophe; Letourneur, Didier; Amédée, Joëlle; Catros, Sylvain
• Is Part Of: Journal of biomedical materials research. Volume 109:Issue 10(2021)
• Page Start: 1840
• Page End: 1848
• Publication Date: 2021-04-02
• Subjects: natural polysaccharides -- injectable matrix -- bone regeneration -- oral surgery; Biomedical materials -- Periodicals; 610.28
• DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.37176
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1549-3296

Abstract

Abstract: Microbeads consisting of pullulan and dextran supplemented with hydroxyapatite have recently been developed for bone tissue engineering applications. Here, we evaluate the bone formation in two different preclinical models after injection of microbeads reconstituted with either saline buffer or autologous blood. Addition of saline solution or autologous blood to dried microbeads packaged into syringes allowed an easy injection. In the first rat bone defect model performed in the femoral condyle, microcomputed tomography performed after 30 and 60 days revealed an important mineralization process occurring around and within the core of the microbeads in both conditions. Bone volume/total volume measurements revealed no significant differences between the saline solution and the autologous blood groups. Histologically, osteoid tissue was evidenced around and in contact of the microbeads in both conditions. Using the sinus lift model performed in sheep, cone beam computed tomography revealed an important mineralization inside the sinus cavity for both groups after 3 months of implantation. Representative Masson trichrome staining images showed that bone formation occurs at the periphery and inside the microbeads in both conditions. Quantitative evaluation of the new bone formation displayed no significant differences between groups. In conclusion, reconstitution of microbeads with autologous blood did not enhance the regenerative capacity of these microbeads compared to the saline buffer group. This study is of particular interest for clinical applications in oral and maxillofacial surgery.