Novel oxytocin receptor antagonists for tocolysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available data on the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of retosiban. (2nd September 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Novel oxytocin receptor antagonists for tocolysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available data on the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of retosiban. (2nd September 2021)
- Main Title:
- Novel oxytocin receptor antagonists for tocolysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available data on the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of retosiban
- Authors:
- Marchand, Greg
Blumrick, Richard
Ruuska, Alexandra D.
Ware, Kelly
Masoud, Ahmed Taher
King, Alexa
Ruther, Stacy
Brazil, Giovanna
Cieminski, Kaitlynne
Calteux, Nicolas
Ulibarri, Hollie
Sainz, Katelyn - Abstract:
- Abstract: Objective: To assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of retosiban—a novel tocolytic unavailable in the US—in the management of preterm labor. Methods: We searched ClinicalTrials.Gov, MEDLINE, PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for relevant clinical trials using the terms "retosiban" and "preterm labor" through 09/2020. We included all published randomized clinical trials (three) that compared retosiban to placebo for preterm labor, excluding conferences, books, reviews, posters, case reports, and animal studies. We analyzed homogeneous data under the fixed-effects model and heterogeneous data under the random-effects model. Results: We included all randomized clinical trials addressing this topic, which ultimately resulted in three trials with a total of 116 patients. There were no significant differences between retosiban and placebo in births at term (RR = 0.41, p = .02), births ≤7 days from the first study treatment (RR = 0.59, p = .23), or administration of rescue tocolytic (RR = 0.36, p = .07); the maternal adverse events of headache, anemia, constipation, or urinary tract infection ( p > .05); or neonatal outcomes of Apgar score at 1 min ( p = .88) or 5 min ( p = .69), weight ( p = .23), head circumference ( p = .55), malnutrition ( p = .27), hyperbilirubinemia (RR = 0.56, p = .21), jaundice (RR = 1.21, p = .84), respiratory distress (RR = 0.53, p = .49), or tachypnea (RR = 0.40, p = .42). Conclusion: With the limitedAbstract: Objective: To assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of retosiban—a novel tocolytic unavailable in the US—in the management of preterm labor. Methods: We searched ClinicalTrials.Gov, MEDLINE, PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for relevant clinical trials using the terms "retosiban" and "preterm labor" through 09/2020. We included all published randomized clinical trials (three) that compared retosiban to placebo for preterm labor, excluding conferences, books, reviews, posters, case reports, and animal studies. We analyzed homogeneous data under the fixed-effects model and heterogeneous data under the random-effects model. Results: We included all randomized clinical trials addressing this topic, which ultimately resulted in three trials with a total of 116 patients. There were no significant differences between retosiban and placebo in births at term (RR = 0.41, p = .02), births ≤7 days from the first study treatment (RR = 0.59, p = .23), or administration of rescue tocolytic (RR = 0.36, p = .07); the maternal adverse events of headache, anemia, constipation, or urinary tract infection ( p > .05); or neonatal outcomes of Apgar score at 1 min ( p = .88) or 5 min ( p = .69), weight ( p = .23), head circumference ( p = .55), malnutrition ( p = .27), hyperbilirubinemia (RR = 0.56, p = .21), jaundice (RR = 1.21, p = .84), respiratory distress (RR = 0.53, p = .49), or tachypnea (RR = 0.40, p = .42). Conclusion: With the limited high quality evidence available, retosiban demonstrates no clear benefit over placebo in the management of preterm labor. Nevertheless, its favorable safety profile, oral bioavailability, and novel mechanism of action and the limited number of studies available for review warrant further analysis. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Current medical research and opinion. Volume 37:Number 9(2021)
- Journal:
- Current medical research and opinion
- Issue:
- Volume 37:Number 9(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 37, Issue 9 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 37
- Issue:
- 9
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0037-0009-0000
- Page Start:
- 1677
- Page End:
- 1688
- Publication Date:
- 2021-09-02
- Subjects:
- Novel medication -- preterm birth -- preterm labor -- retosiban -- systematic review -- tocolytic
Clinical medicine -- Periodicals
Therapeutics -- Periodicals
615.5 - Journal URLs:
- http://informahealthcare.com ↗
- DOI:
- 10.1080/03007995.2021.1944076 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0300-7995
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3500.301000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 18538.xml