218 The Relationship between Carotid Artery Intimal-Medial Thickness and Left Ventricular Function by Speckle Tracking Echocardiography in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease. (3rd June 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Radwan, Hanan; Mostafa, Tamer; Seleem, Abdelhakem; Hussein, Ekhlas
• Is Part Of: Heart. Volume 102(2016)Supplement 6
• Page Start: A144
• Page End: A144
• Publication Date: 2016-06-03
• Subjects: 2D speckle tracking echo. -- carotid intimal medial thickness -- CAD /coronary angiography; Heart -- Diseases -- Treatment -- Periodicals; Cardiology -- Periodicals; 616.12
• DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-309890.218
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1355-6037

Abstract

Abstract : Background and aim of the work: Since cardiovascular diseases are associated with high mortality and generally undiagnosed before the onset of clinical findings, there is a need for a reliable tool for early diagnosis. Carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) is a non-invasive marker of coronary artery disease (CAD) and is widely used in practice as an inexpensive, reliable method. Left ventricular (LV) function can be accurately assessed by 2D speckle-tracking strain echocardiography (2D-STE). In our study, we aimed to investigate the relationship of CIMT and LV function assessed by 2D-STE in patients with stable (CAD) and the ability of 2D-STE and CIMT to predict significant CAD. Methods: Cross sectional study included 40 patients with history suspected stable angina pectoris, normal LV ejection fraction. All patients were examined by 2D-STE, carotid ultraound, and coronary angiography (CA). 2D-STE was performed in the 3 apical projections. Peak regional longitudinal systolic strain was measured in 17 myocardial segments and averaged to provide global longitudinal peak systolic strain (GLS). LVGLS results were compared with CA findings in a receiver operating curve (ROC) to determine the cut-off for normal and abnormal strain values. The calculated optimal strain value was compared to mean CIMT measurements. The patients were divided into two groups according to the result of the CA: group 1 (29 patients) with significant coronary lesion > 70%, and group 2 (11 patients) having at least one lesion more than 50% within the main branches of the coronary arteries. Results: GLS was significantly lower in patients with CAD+ (group 1) compared to patients without CAD- (group 2) [−11.86 ± 2.89% versus −18.65 ± 0.79%] P < 0.001. ROC curve between GLS and CA showed cut-off value for LVGLS was less than -15.6% for prediction of significant CAD with AUC = 0878; 95% CI 0.78–0.96 p 0.00. The diagnostic performance of GLS for detecting severity of CAD was [sensitivity 93.1%, specificity 81.8% and accuracy 90%]. The mean CIMT was 1.49 ± 0.35 mm in group 1, vs 0.75 ± 0.3 mm in group (2) (p = 0.000). ROC curve between mean CIMT and CA showed cutoff value for mean CIMT was > 1.1 mm for prediction of significant CAD with AUC= 0.871 (95% CI 0.79–0.97, p 0.00. There was a significant, nearly linear correlation between IMT and GLS and advancing CAD (p, 0.00), as there was incremental significant increase in CIMT and decrease of GLS with increasing number of coronary vessels involved. Further analyses showed that GLS was highly significant negatively correlated with mean CIMT. Conclusion: GLS assessed by 2DSTE at rest was predictor of significant CAD; So 2DSE seems capable of identifying high-risk patients. Increased carotid IMT values were associated with decreased LV function assessed by 2D strain measurements and the presence and severity of CAD. So these findings support the use of carotid IMT measurements as marker of subclinical LV dysfunction and to predict risk and severity of coronary heart disease.