The bigger picture of shared decision making: A service design perspective using the care path of locally advanced pancreatic cancer as a case. (30th July 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Griffioen, Ingeborg P. M.; Rietjens, Judith A. C.; Melles, Marijke; Snelders, Dirk; Homs, Marjolein Y. V.; van Eijck, Casper H.; Stiggelbout, Anne M.
• Is Part Of: Cancer medicine. Volume 10:Number 17(2021)
• Page Start: 5907
• Page End: 5916
• Publication Date: 2021-07-30
• Subjects: oncology -- pancreatic cancer -- qualitative -- service design -- shared decision making; 616.994005
• DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4145
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2045-7634

Abstract

Abstract: Purpose: Solutions to improve the implementation of shared decision making (SDM) in oncology often focus on the consultation, with limited effects. In this study, we used a service design perspective on the care path of locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). We aimed to understand how experiences of patients, their significant others, and medical professionals over the entire care path accumulate to support their ability to participate in SDM. Participants and methods: We used qualitative interviews including design research techniques with 13 patients, 13 significant others, and 11 healthcare professionals, involved in the diagnosis or treatment of LAPC. The topic list was based on the literature and an auto‐ethnography of the illness trajectory by a caregiver who is also a service design researcher. We conducted a thematic content analysis to identify themes influencing the ability to participate in SDM. Results: We found four interconnected themes: (1) Decision making is an ongoing and unpredictable process with many decision moments, often unannounced. The unpredictability of the disease course, tumor response to treatment, and consequences of choices on the quality of life complicate decision making; (2) Division of roles, tasks, and collaboration among professionals and between professionals and patients and/or their significant others is often unclear to patients and their significant others; (3) It involves "work" for patients and their significant others to obtain and understand information; (4) In "their disease journey, " patients are confronted with unexpected energy drains and energy boosts, that influence their level of empowerment to participate in SDM. Conclusion: The service design perspective uncovered how the stage for SDM is often set outside the consultation, which might explain the limited effect currently seen of interventions focusing on consultation itself. Our findings serve as a starting point for (re)designing care paths to improve the implementation of SDM in oncology. Abstract : The service design perspective uncovered four interconnected themes. Our findings serve as a starting point for (re)designing care paths to improve the implementation of SDM in oncology.