First‐line combination chemotherapy with etoposide, ifosfamide and cisplatin for the treatment of disseminated germ cell cancer: Efficacy and feasibility in current clinical practice. (24th May 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Fujiwara, Motohiro; Tanaka, Hajime; Yuasa, Takeshi; Komai, Yoshinobu; Oguchi, Tomohiko; Fujiwara, Ryo; Numao, Noboru; Yamamoto, Shinya; Fujii, Yasuhisa; Fukui, Iwao; Yonese, Junji
• Is Part Of: International journal of urology. Volume 28:Number 9(2021)
• Page Start: 920
• Page End: 926
• Publication Date: 2021-05-24
• Subjects: etoposide -- ifosfamide and cisplatin -- first‐line -- germ cell cancer -- pegfilgrastim -- primary prophylaxis; Urology -- Periodicals; Genitourinary organs -- Periodicals; Urologic Diseases -- Periodicals; 616.6005
• DOI: 10.1111/iju.14604
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0919-8172

Abstract

Abstract : Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety profiles of first‐line etoposide, ifosfamide and cisplatin and primary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim as first‐line chemotherapy for disseminated germ cell cancer. Methods: This study reviewed 154 consecutive patients with previously untreated disseminated germ cell cancer who received first‐line etoposide, ifosfamide and cisplatin between 1995 and 2020. Of these, 54 patients were managed with primary prophylaxis using pegfilgrastim (primary prophylaxis group), and 100 were managed with the therapeutic use of short‐acting granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor (non‐primary prophylaxis group). Results: The International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group classification identified 90 (58%)/40 (26%)/24 (16%) patients with good/intermediate/poor prognosis, respectively. Overall, 139 patients (90%) were disease free after etoposide, ifosfamide and cisplatin with/without post‐chemotherapy surgery. The median relative dose intensity of etoposide, ifosfamide and cisplatin was 96%, and there was a significant difference between the primary prophylaxis and non‐primary prophylaxis groups (100% vs 90%, P < 0.01). The 5‐year salvage treatment‐free and overall survival rates were 83% and 94%, respectively. In total, 138 patients (90%) developed grade 4 hematological toxicities, and there were no treatment‐related deaths due to myelosuppression. Grade 4 neutropenia was less commonly observed in the primary prophylaxis group compared with the non‐primary prophylaxis group (80% vs 95%, P < 0.01). Conclusions: This is the largest study of first‐line etoposide, ifosfamide and cisplatin, and its sufficient efficacy and safety profiles are confirmed in current clinical practice. Primary prophylaxis using pegfilgrastim might further improve the feasibility of etoposide, ifosfamide and cisplatin.