The peppermint breath test benchmark for PTR-MS and SIFT-MS. (6th September 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- The peppermint breath test benchmark for PTR-MS and SIFT-MS. (6th September 2021)
- Main Title:
- The peppermint breath test benchmark for PTR-MS and SIFT-MS
- Authors:
- Henderson, Ben
Slingers, Gitte
Pedrotti, Michele
Pugliese, Giovanni
Malásková, Michaela
Bryant, Luke
Lomonaco, Tommaso
Ghimenti, Silvia
Moreno, Sergi
Cordell, Rebecca
Harren, Frans J M
Schubert, Jochen
Mayhew, Chris A
Wilde, Michael
Di Francesco, Fabio
Koppen, Gudrun
Beauchamp, Jonathan D
Cristescu, Simona M - Other Names:
- collab.
- Abstract:
- Abstract: A major challenge for breath research is the lack of standardization in sampling and analysis. To address this, a test that utilizes a standardized intervention and a defined study protocol has been proposed to explore disparities in breath research across different analytical platforms and to provide benchmark values for comparison. Specifically, the Peppermint Experiment involves the targeted analysis in exhaled breath of volatile constituents of peppermint oil after ingestion of the encapsulated oil. Data from the Peppermint Experiment performed by proton transfer reaction mass spectrometry (PTR-MS) and selected ion flow tube mass spectrometry (SIFT-MS) are presented and discussed herein, including the product ions associated with the key peppermint volatiles, namely limonene, α - and β -pinene, 1, 8-cineole, menthol, menthone and menthofuran. The breath washout profiles of these compounds from 65 individuals were collected, comprising datasets from five PTR-MS and two SIFT-MS instruments. The washout profiles of these volatiles were evaluated by comparing the log-fold change over time of the product ion intensities associated with each volatile. Benchmark values were calculated from the lower 95% confidence interval of the linear time-to-washout regression analysis for all datasets combined. Benchmark washout values from PTR-MS analysis were 353 min for the sum of monoterpenes and 1, 8-cineole (identical product ions), 173 min for menthol, 330 min forAbstract: A major challenge for breath research is the lack of standardization in sampling and analysis. To address this, a test that utilizes a standardized intervention and a defined study protocol has been proposed to explore disparities in breath research across different analytical platforms and to provide benchmark values for comparison. Specifically, the Peppermint Experiment involves the targeted analysis in exhaled breath of volatile constituents of peppermint oil after ingestion of the encapsulated oil. Data from the Peppermint Experiment performed by proton transfer reaction mass spectrometry (PTR-MS) and selected ion flow tube mass spectrometry (SIFT-MS) are presented and discussed herein, including the product ions associated with the key peppermint volatiles, namely limonene, α - and β -pinene, 1, 8-cineole, menthol, menthone and menthofuran. The breath washout profiles of these compounds from 65 individuals were collected, comprising datasets from five PTR-MS and two SIFT-MS instruments. The washout profiles of these volatiles were evaluated by comparing the log-fold change over time of the product ion intensities associated with each volatile. Benchmark values were calculated from the lower 95% confidence interval of the linear time-to-washout regression analysis for all datasets combined. Benchmark washout values from PTR-MS analysis were 353 min for the sum of monoterpenes and 1, 8-cineole (identical product ions), 173 min for menthol, 330 min for menthofuran, and 218 min for menthone; from SIFT-MS analysis values were 228 min for the sum of monoterpenes, 281 min for the sum of monoterpenes and 1, 8-cineole, and 370 min for menthone plus 1, 8-cineole. Large inter- and intra-dataset variations were observed, whereby the latter suggests that biological variability plays a key role in how the compounds are absorbed, metabolized and excreted from the body via breath. This variability seems large compared to the influence of sampling and analytical procedures, but further investigations are recommended to clarify the effects of these factors. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of breath research. Volume 15:Number 4(2021)
- Journal:
- Journal of breath research
- Issue:
- Volume 15:Number 4(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 15, Issue 4 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 15
- Issue:
- 4
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0015-0004-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2021-09-06
- Subjects:
- standardization -- breathomics -- peppermint -- benchmark -- PTR-MS -- SIFT-MS -- pharmacokinetics
Volatile organic compounds -- Analysis -- Periodicals
Clinical chemistry -- Periodicals
Bad breath -- Periodicals
Bad breath -- Treatment -- Periodicals
Bad breath -- Diagnosis -- Periodicals
616.0756 - Journal URLs:
- http://iopscience.iop.org/1752-7163/ ↗
http://ioppublishing.org/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1088/1752-7163/ac1fcf ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1752-7155
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 18516.xml