Extensive functional comparisons between chimeric antigen receptors and T cell receptors highlight fundamental similarities. (October 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Extensive functional comparisons between chimeric antigen receptors and T cell receptors highlight fundamental similarities. (October 2021)
- Main Title:
- Extensive functional comparisons between chimeric antigen receptors and T cell receptors highlight fundamental similarities
- Authors:
- Wang, Xueyin
Martin, Aaron D.
Negri, Kathleen R.
McElvain, Michele E.
Oh, Julyun
Wu, Ming-Lun
Lee, Wen-Hua
Ando, Yuta
Gabrelow, Grant B.
Toledo Warshaviak, Dora
Sandberg, Mark L.
Xu, Han
Kamb, Alexander - Abstract:
- Graphical abstract: Highlights: Compared multiple CARs to TCRs directed at the same targets in acute and long-term functional assays. CAR-Ts similar to TCR-Ts with regard to immune modulation in vitro: cytokine (IL-2), co-stimulation (CD28), checkpoint (PD-1). Implies commonality of signaling mechanisms for activation, proliferation, cytotoxicity. No intrinsic advantage to either receptor class for cell therapy with respect to activation or exhaustion. Abstract: Though TCRs have been subject to limited engineering in the context of therapeutic design and optimization, they are used largely as found in nature. On the other hand, CARs are artificial, composed of different segments of proteins that function in the immune system. This characteristic raises the possibility of altered response to immune regulatory stimuli. Here we describe a large-scale, systematic comparison of CARs and TCRs across 5 different pMHC targets, with a total of 19 constructs examined in vitro . These functional measurements include CAR- and TCR-mediated activation, proliferation, and cytotoxicity in both acute and chronic settings. Surprisingly, we find no consistent difference between CARs and TCRs as receptor classes with respect to their relative sensitivity to major regulators of T cell activation: PD-L1, CD80/86 and IL-2. Though TCRs often emerge from human blood directly as potent, selective receptors, CARs must be heavily optimized to attain these properties for pMHC targets. Nonetheless, whenGraphical abstract: Highlights: Compared multiple CARs to TCRs directed at the same targets in acute and long-term functional assays. CAR-Ts similar to TCR-Ts with regard to immune modulation in vitro: cytokine (IL-2), co-stimulation (CD28), checkpoint (PD-1). Implies commonality of signaling mechanisms for activation, proliferation, cytotoxicity. No intrinsic advantage to either receptor class for cell therapy with respect to activation or exhaustion. Abstract: Though TCRs have been subject to limited engineering in the context of therapeutic design and optimization, they are used largely as found in nature. On the other hand, CARs are artificial, composed of different segments of proteins that function in the immune system. This characteristic raises the possibility of altered response to immune regulatory stimuli. Here we describe a large-scale, systematic comparison of CARs and TCRs across 5 different pMHC targets, with a total of 19 constructs examined in vitro . These functional measurements include CAR- and TCR-mediated activation, proliferation, and cytotoxicity in both acute and chronic settings. Surprisingly, we find no consistent difference between CARs and TCRs as receptor classes with respect to their relative sensitivity to major regulators of T cell activation: PD-L1, CD80/86 and IL-2. Though TCRs often emerge from human blood directly as potent, selective receptors, CARs must be heavily optimized to attain these properties for pMHC targets. Nonetheless, when iteratively improved and compared head to head in functional tests, CARs appear remarkably similar to TCRs with respect to immune modulation. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Molecular immunology. Volume 138(2021)
- Journal:
- Molecular immunology
- Issue:
- Volume 138(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 138, Issue 2021 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 138
- Issue:
- 2021
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0138-2021-0000
- Page Start:
- 137
- Page End:
- 149
- Publication Date:
- 2021-10
- Subjects:
- CAR chimeric antigen receptor -- TCR T cell receptor -- pMHC peptide-major-histocompatibility complex -- LBD ligand-binding domain -- TM transmembrane -- ICD intracellular domain -- B2M beta-2-microglobulin -- MFI median fluorescence intensity -- RACA repeated-antigen-challenge assay -- Re-stim re-stimulation -- POC percent of control
CAR -- TCR -- Sensitivity -- Exhaustion -- Checkpoint -- Co-stimulation
Immunochemistry -- Periodicals
Molecular biology -- Periodicals
Immunochemistry -- Periodicals
Allergy and Immunology -- Periodicals
Molecular Biology -- Periodicals
Immunochimie -- Périodiques
Biologie moléculaire -- Périodiques
Immunochemistry
Molecular biology
Periodicals
Electronic journals
571.96 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/01615890 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.molimm.2021.07.018 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0161-5890
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5900.817700
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 18497.xml