Measuring subjective stress among young people in Hong Kong: validation and predictive utility of the single-item subjective level of stress (SLS-1) in epidemiological and longitudinal community samples. (8th September 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wong, S. M. Y.; Lam, B. Y. H.; Wong, C. S. M.; Lee, H. P. Y.; Wong, G. H. Y.; Lui, S. S. Y.; Chan, K. T.; Wong, M. T. H.; Chan, S. K. W.; Chang, W. C.; Lee, E. H. M.; Suen, Y. N.; Hui, C. L. M.; Chen, E. Y. H.
• Is Part Of: Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences. Volume 30(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-09-08
• Subjects: Adolescents -- depression -- epidemiology -- stress -- validation study; Epidemiology -- Periodicals; Mental illness -- Periodicals; Community psychiatry -- Periodicals; 362.2
• DOI: 10.1017/S2045796021000445
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2045-7960

Abstract

Abstract: Aims: Brief measurements of the subjective experience of stress with good predictive capability are important in a range of community mental health and research settings. The potential for large-scale implementation of such a measure for screening may facilitate early risk detection and intervention opportunities. Few such measures however have been developed and validated in epidemiological and longitudinal community samples. We designed a new single-item measure of the subjective level of stress (SLS-1) and tested its validity and ability to predict long-term mental health outcomes of up to 12 months through two separate studies. Methods: We first examined the content and face validity of the SLS-1 with a panel consisting of mental health experts and laypersons. Two studies were conducted to examine its validity and predictive utility. In study 1, we tested the convergent and divergent validity as well as incremental validity of the SLS-1 in a large epidemiological sample of young people in Hong Kong ( n = 1445). In study 2, in a consecutively recruited longitudinal community sample of young people ( n = 258), we first performed the same procedures as in study 1 to ensure replicability of the findings. We then examined in this longitudinal sample the utility of the SLS-1 in predicting long-term depressive, anxiety and stress outcomes assessed at 3 months and 6 months ( n = 182) and at 12 months ( n = 84). Results: The SLS-1 demonstrated good content and face validity. Findings from the two studies showed that SLS-1 was moderately to strongly correlated with a range of mental health outcomes, including depressive, anxiety, stress and distress symptoms. We also demonstrated its ability to explain the variance explained in symptoms beyond other known personal and psychological factors. Using the longitudinal sample in study 2, we further showed the significant predictive capability of the SLS-1 for long-term symptom outcomes for up to 12 months even when accounting for demographic characteristics. Conclusions: The findings altogether support the validity and predictive utility of the SLS-1 as a brief measure of stress with strong indications of both concurrent and long-term mental health outcomes. Given the value of brief measures of mental health risks at a population level, the SLS-1 may have potential for use as an early screening tool to inform early preventative intervention work.