Genetically determined risk of keratinocyte carcinoma and risk of other cancers. (28th December 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Dusingize, Jean Claude; Olsen, Catherine M; An, Jiyuan; Pandeya, Nirmala; Liyanage, Upekha E; Law, Matthew H; Neale, Rachel E; Ong, Jue-Sheng; MacGregor, Stuart; Whiteman, David C
• Is Part Of: International journal of epidemiology. Volume 50:Number 4(2021)
• Page Start: 1316
• Page End: 1324
• Publication Date: 2020-12-28
• Subjects: Keratinocyte carcinoma -- cutaneous melanoma -- non-cutaneous cancers -- instrumental variables -- GWAS -- polygenic risk score; Epidemiology -- Periodicals; 614.4
• DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyaa265
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0300-5771

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Epidemiological studies have consistently documented an increased risk of developing primary non-cutaneous malignancies among people with a history of keratinocyte carcinoma (KC). However, the mechanisms underlying this association remain unclear. We conducted two separate analyses to test whether genetically predicted KC is related to the risk of developing cancers at other sites. Methods: In the first approach (one-sample), we calculated the polygenic risk scores (PRS) for KC using individual-level data in the UK Biobank ( n = 394 306) and QSkin cohort ( n = 16 896). The association between the KC PRS and each cancer site was assessed using logistic regression. In the secondary (two-sample) approach, we used genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics identified from the most recent GWAS meta-analysis of KC and obtained GWAS data for each cancer site from the UK-Biobank participants only. We used inverse-variance-weighted methods to estimate risks across all genetic variants. Results: Using the one-sample approach, we found that the risks of cancer at other sites increased monotonically with KC PRS quartiles, with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.16, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.13–1.19 for those in KC PRS quartile 4 compared with those in quartile 1. In the two-sample approach, the pooled risk of developing other cancers was statistically significantly elevated, with an OR of 1.05, 95% CI: 1.03–1.07 per doubling in the odds of KC. We observed similar trends of increasing cancer risk with increasing KC PRS in the QSkin cohort. Conclusion: Two different genetic approaches provide compelling evidence that an instrumental variable for KC constructed from genetic variants predicts the risk of cancers at other sites.