Exploring the optimal crop planting structure to balance water saving, food security and incomes under the spatiotemporal heterogeneity of the agricultural climate. (1st October 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wang, Shuo; Fu, Guorui; Ma, Xiaoqing; Xu, Ling; Yang, Fenglin
• Is Part Of: Journal of environmental management. Volume 295(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-10-01
• Subjects: Water footprint -- Spatiotemporal heterogeneity -- Fuzzy optimization program -- Liaoning province; Environmental policy -- Periodicals; Environmental management -- Periodicals; Environment -- Periodicals; Ecology -- Periodicals; 363.705
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113130
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0301-4797

Abstract

Abstract: Crop planting provided foods, generated incomes, and consumed water resources to different extents under different spatiotemporal agroclimatic conditions. For balancing three aspects, targeting the rice, maize, wheat, and sorghum planted in Liaoning during the recent two decades, we established an integrated research framework consisting of water footprint (WF) accounting, clustering analysis, and fuzzy optimization programming to quantify the temporal trends and spatial distribution of water footprints, and optimized the planting structure under the different spatiotemporal agroclimatic conditions. Results showed that the maximum water footprint differences were 4166.73 m 3 /t and 4790.71 m 3 /t in spatial distribution and temporal series, respectively. Based on precipitation, we established 12 agroclimatic scenarios according to K-Means clustering. The fuzzy optimization result indicated that the planting area percent ranges of maize, wheat, rice, and sorghum in Liaoning province were 4.96%–98.62%, 0.00%–8.55%, 0.00%–18.18%, and 0.00%–95.04%, respectively under the different spatiotemporal conditions. This study's methods and results help make targeted decisions related to grain planting structure while considering the complex spatial-temporal conditions. Highlights: The spatiotemporal heterogeneity of water footprint was extensive. The cultivation technology was the essential factor for structure optimization. It was hard to achieve targets of water resources, yields and income simultaneously.