Immunotherapy for arterial ischaemic stroke in childhood: a systematic review. Issue 5 (18th November 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Edwards, Hannah B; Mallick, Andrew A; O'Callaghan, Finbar J K
• Is Part Of: Archives of disease in childhood. Volume 102:Issue 5(2017)
• Page Start: 410
• Page End: 415
• Publication Date: 2016-11-18
• Subjects: Evidence Based Medicine -- Neurology -- Immunotherapy -- Arterial Ischaemic Stroke -- Steroids; Children -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Infants -- Diseases -- Periodicals; 618.920005
• DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2016-311034
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0003-9888

Abstract

Abstract : Background: There is little evidence about either prevention or treatment of childhood arterial ischaemic stroke (AIS). However, drugs that regulate the immune and inflammatory response could theoretically prevent occurrence or recurrence of AIS. Additionally, as an acute treatment, they may limit the neurological damage caused by AIS. Here, we systematically review the evidence on the use of immunotherapy in childhood AIS. Design: A systematic review of publications in databases Embase and Medline from inception. All types of evidence were included from trials, cohorts, case–control and cross-sectional studies and case reports. Results: 34 reports were included: 32 observational studies and 2 trials. Immunotherapy was used in two key patient groups: arteriopathy and acute infection. The majority were cases of varicella and primary angiitis of the central nervous system. All three cohorts and 80% of the case studies were treated with steroids. Recurrence rates were low. Analytical studies weakly associated steroids with lower odds of new stroke and neurological deficits, and better cognitive outcomes in the context of Moyamoya disease and tuberculosis. Conclusions: Immunotherapies are used in children with AIS, mainly as steroids for children with arteriopathy. However, there is currently little robust evidence to either encourage or discourage this practice. There is weak evidence consistent with the hypothesis that in certain children at risk, steroids may both reduce the risk of occurrent/recurrent stroke and enhance neurological outcomes. As the potential benefit is still uncertain, this indicates that a trial of steroids in childhood AIS may be justified.