Evaluation of Efficacy, Safety, and Cognitive Profile of Amisulpride Per Se and Its Comparison with Olanzapine in Newly Diagnosed Schizophrenic Patients in an 8-Week, Double-Blind, Single-Centre, Prospective Clinical Trial. (14th March 2012)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Evaluation of Efficacy, Safety, and Cognitive Profile of Amisulpride Per Se and Its Comparison with Olanzapine in Newly Diagnosed Schizophrenic Patients in an 8-Week, Double-Blind, Single-Centre, Prospective Clinical Trial. (14th March 2012)
- Main Title:
- Evaluation of Efficacy, Safety, and Cognitive Profile of Amisulpride Per Se and Its Comparison with Olanzapine in Newly Diagnosed Schizophrenic Patients in an 8-Week, Double-Blind, Single-Centre, Prospective Clinical Trial
- Authors:
- Pawar, Ganesh R.
Phadnis, P.
Paliwal, A. - Other Names:
- Michael A. Academic Editor.
Weizman A. Academic Editor. - Abstract:
- Abstract : Background . Impaired cognitive functions in schizophrenia are the major deciding factors in response to treatment. Conventional antipsychotics have minimal impact on cognitive dysfunctions and are associated with adverse effects. Atypical antipsychotics have shown promise in treatment of cognitive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia. Efforts are underway to find out the best drug amongst atypical antipsychotics. Objective . To compare efficacy, safety, and cognitive profile of amisulpride and olanzapine in the treatment of acute psychotic exacerbations of schizophrenia. Method . A prospective, randomized, double-blind, single-center, 8-week clinical trial we used. Subjects and Treatments . Seventy four patients were treated for two months with either amisulpride (400–800 mg/d) or olanzapine (10–20 mg/d). Statistics . Mann Whitney U test we used for independent samples with P < 0.05 taken as significant. Results . Brief psychiatric rating scale (BPRS) was used as a primary measure of efficacy. Other measures of efficacy and safety were also evaluated. Both amisulpride and olanzapine groups showed equivalent improvement in psychotic symptoms on BPRS scale. Less than five percent of patients suffered adverse effects only to withdraw from the study. Olanzapine group showed statistically significant (P < 0.05 ) weight gain compared with amisulpride group. Amisulpride group showed significant improvement (P < 0.05 ) in various cognitive parameters as compared toAbstract : Background . Impaired cognitive functions in schizophrenia are the major deciding factors in response to treatment. Conventional antipsychotics have minimal impact on cognitive dysfunctions and are associated with adverse effects. Atypical antipsychotics have shown promise in treatment of cognitive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia. Efforts are underway to find out the best drug amongst atypical antipsychotics. Objective . To compare efficacy, safety, and cognitive profile of amisulpride and olanzapine in the treatment of acute psychotic exacerbations of schizophrenia. Method . A prospective, randomized, double-blind, single-center, 8-week clinical trial we used. Subjects and Treatments . Seventy four patients were treated for two months with either amisulpride (400–800 mg/d) or olanzapine (10–20 mg/d). Statistics . Mann Whitney U test we used for independent samples with P < 0.05 taken as significant. Results . Brief psychiatric rating scale (BPRS) was used as a primary measure of efficacy. Other measures of efficacy and safety were also evaluated. Both amisulpride and olanzapine groups showed equivalent improvement in psychotic symptoms on BPRS scale. Less than five percent of patients suffered adverse effects only to withdraw from the study. Olanzapine group showed statistically significant (P < 0.05 ) weight gain compared with amisulpride group. Amisulpride group showed significant improvement (P < 0.05 ) in various cognitive parameters as compared to olanzapine group. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- ISRN psychiatry. Volume 2012(2012)
- Journal:
- ISRN psychiatry
- Issue:
- Volume 2012(2012)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 2012, Issue 2012 (2012)
- Year:
- 2012
- Volume:
- 2012
- Issue:
- 2012
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2012-2012-2012-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2012-03-14
- Subjects:
- Psychiatry -- Periodicals
Psychology, Pathological -- Periodicals
Mental illness -- Periodicals
Mental Disorders
Psychiatry
Mental illness
Psychiatry
Psychology, Pathological
Electronic journals
Periodical
Fulltext
Internet Resources
Periodicals
Periodicals
616.89 - Journal URLs:
- https://www.hindawi.com/journals/isrn/contents/isrn.psychiatry/ ↗
- DOI:
- 10.5402/2012/703751 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2090-7966
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store
- Ingest File:
- 18429.xml