PPO.65 A legal and ethical debate on surrogate pregnany: successful challenge of the hfea defination motherhod. how will this affect doctors in the uk and eu countries?. (9th June 2014)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- PPO.65 A legal and ethical debate on surrogate pregnany: successful challenge of the hfea defination motherhod. how will this affect doctors in the uk and eu countries?. (9th June 2014)
- Main Title:
- PPO.65 A legal and ethical debate on surrogate pregnany: successful challenge of the hfea defination motherhod. how will this affect doctors in the uk and eu countries?
- Authors:
- Burrell, C
- Abstract:
- Abstract : Background: In the UK there are no formal guidelines for Obstetricians, Commissioning Parents or Surrogates about pregnancy. There are no Obstetric or Paediatric Registry, audit or pregnancy follow-up. The "contract, " between the surrogate and commissioning couple is legally unenforceable. Method: Under UK jurisdiction, The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act (HFEA) 2008 Section 33 dictates that the surrogate is the legal mother, irrespective of who donated the egg. This paper discusses a landmark case – (R and Another v An tArd Chlaraitheoir and Ors [2013] IEHC 91). Result: An Irish commissioning couple successfully challenged the HFEA 2008 legal definition of motherhood. - The Birth Registrar's legal representative argued that the medical records confirmed that the surrogate was the legal mother because she gave birth. - The commissioning couple's counsel proposed that the child was genetically from the commissioning couple highlighting the sacred mother-to-child blood link bond trumping other factors. - Irish High Court Judge's Verdict: Set a precedent by making the commissioning/genetic mother the legal mother; therefore allowed her to sign the children's birth certificate. Conclusion: Surrogacy is increasing because – (1) Advances in assisted reproductive technology, (2) Legislative changes - HFEA Act 2008 part 3 now gives same sex and unmarried couples equal rights as married couples in surrogacy arrangements. Learning points: (3) Although LEGALLY theAbstract : Background: In the UK there are no formal guidelines for Obstetricians, Commissioning Parents or Surrogates about pregnancy. There are no Obstetric or Paediatric Registry, audit or pregnancy follow-up. The "contract, " between the surrogate and commissioning couple is legally unenforceable. Method: Under UK jurisdiction, The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act (HFEA) 2008 Section 33 dictates that the surrogate is the legal mother, irrespective of who donated the egg. This paper discusses a landmark case – (R and Another v An tArd Chlaraitheoir and Ors [2013] IEHC 91). Result: An Irish commissioning couple successfully challenged the HFEA 2008 legal definition of motherhood. - The Birth Registrar's legal representative argued that the medical records confirmed that the surrogate was the legal mother because she gave birth. - The commissioning couple's counsel proposed that the child was genetically from the commissioning couple highlighting the sacred mother-to-child blood link bond trumping other factors. - Irish High Court Judge's Verdict: Set a precedent by making the commissioning/genetic mother the legal mother; therefore allowed her to sign the children's birth certificate. Conclusion: Surrogacy is increasing because – (1) Advances in assisted reproductive technology, (2) Legislative changes - HFEA Act 2008 part 3 now gives same sex and unmarried couples equal rights as married couples in surrogacy arrangements. Learning points: (3) Although LEGALLY the commissioning couple can be regarded as the mother, doctors should have no conflict of interest because MEDICALLY the surrogate remains the mother and patient to whom a duty of care is owed. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Archives of disease in childhood. Volume 99:Supplement 1(2014)
- Journal:
- Archives of disease in childhood
- Issue:
- Volume 99:Supplement 1(2014)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 99, Issue 1 (2014)
- Year:
- 2014
- Volume:
- 99
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2014-0099-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- A171
- Page End:
- A171
- Publication Date:
- 2014-06-09
- Subjects:
- Infants -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Newborn infants -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Fetus -- Diseases -- Periodicals
618.920105 - Journal URLs:
- http://fn.bmjjournals.com ↗
http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/archdischild-2014-306576.504 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1359-2998
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 18426.xml