Can we improve obstetric outcomes in type 1 diabetic pregnancy?. (18th April 2012)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Can we improve obstetric outcomes in type 1 diabetic pregnancy?. (18th April 2012)
- Main Title:
- Can we improve obstetric outcomes in type 1 diabetic pregnancy?
- Authors:
- Pearson, L
Maresh, MJA - Abstract:
- Abstract : The 2002-3 national survey of diabetic pregnancy (CEMACH)1 confirmed the continued poor outcomes in diabetic pregnancy. Pregnancies in a consecutive cohort of 197 type 1 diabetic women who reached the second trimester between 1998-2010 were studied. They were managed by the same team in an individualised manner using standard protocols and their outcomes compared to CEMACH data. Factors reflecting pre-pregnancy care such as pre-conception counselling, use of folic acid and early HbA1c values did not differ significantly from CEMACH. Deprivation was significantly more common with 48% in the most deprived quintile compared to 22% in CEMACH. Despite this the median gestation at first assessment was 56 days. However there was a higher rate of congenital malformations than in CEMACH (86/1000 v. 48/1000, p<0.03) which did not appear to relate to deprivation, but more to lack of pre-pregnancy care. There were 2 ante-partum stillbirths at 26 and 37 weeks (10/1000) compared to CEMACH (26/1000). The caesarean section rate was less than CEMACH (52% v. 67% p<0.0001). There was a trend towards less preterm deliveries in our cohort (31% v. 37%). Significantly less babies in our cohort had birthweights >90 th centile (41% v 52%, p<0.005) and less babies in our cohort were separated from their mothers by admission to special care units (39% v 51%, p<0.0001) In conclusion it appears that centralisation of care of type 1 diabetic pregnancy to larger units able to individualise careAbstract : The 2002-3 national survey of diabetic pregnancy (CEMACH)1 confirmed the continued poor outcomes in diabetic pregnancy. Pregnancies in a consecutive cohort of 197 type 1 diabetic women who reached the second trimester between 1998-2010 were studied. They were managed by the same team in an individualised manner using standard protocols and their outcomes compared to CEMACH data. Factors reflecting pre-pregnancy care such as pre-conception counselling, use of folic acid and early HbA1c values did not differ significantly from CEMACH. Deprivation was significantly more common with 48% in the most deprived quintile compared to 22% in CEMACH. Despite this the median gestation at first assessment was 56 days. However there was a higher rate of congenital malformations than in CEMACH (86/1000 v. 48/1000, p<0.03) which did not appear to relate to deprivation, but more to lack of pre-pregnancy care. There were 2 ante-partum stillbirths at 26 and 37 weeks (10/1000) compared to CEMACH (26/1000). The caesarean section rate was less than CEMACH (52% v. 67% p<0.0001). There was a trend towards less preterm deliveries in our cohort (31% v. 37%). Significantly less babies in our cohort had birthweights >90 th centile (41% v 52%, p<0.005) and less babies in our cohort were separated from their mothers by admission to special care units (39% v 51%, p<0.0001) In conclusion it appears that centralisation of care of type 1 diabetic pregnancy to larger units able to individualise care may be associated with more normal obstetric outcomes; however pre-pregnancy preparation remains a major issue. Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Archives of disease in childhood. Volume 97(2012)Supplement 1
- Journal:
- Archives of disease in childhood
- Issue:
- Volume 97(2012)Supplement 1
- Issue Display:
- Volume 97, Issue 1 (2012)
- Year:
- 2012
- Volume:
- 97
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2012-0097-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- A44
- Page End:
- A45
- Publication Date:
- 2012-04-18
- Subjects:
- Infants -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Newborn infants -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Fetus -- Diseases -- Periodicals
618.920105 - Journal URLs:
- http://fn.bmjjournals.com ↗
http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/fetalneonatal-2012-301809.141 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1359-2998
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 18422.xml